• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用利雅视力表15行折叠距离视力筛查方案在学龄前儿童中的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of a visual acuity screening protocol performed with the Lea Symbols 15-line folding distance chart in preschool children.

作者信息

Bertuzzi Francesca, Orsoni Jelka Gabriella, Porta Maria Rita, Paliaga Gian Paolo, Miglior Stefano

机构信息

Policlinico di Monza Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Dec;84(6):807-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00668.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00668.x
PMID:17083543
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a visual acuity (VA) test using the Lea Symbols 15-line folding distance chart and its diagnostic validity in detecting VA deficiency in preschool children.

METHODS

A group of 149 children aged 38-54 months underwent VA examination performed with the Lea 15-line folding optotype at a distance of 3 metres, according to a test protocol described in the Methods section. After the VA test, a complete ophthalmological examination, including cycloplegic retinoscopy, a cover test and examination of the anterior and posterior segments, was performed on each child in order to detect any VA-threatening ocular abnormality. The Lea Symbols test's sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR +, LR -) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated by means of standard procedures using each VA level of the chart from 0.1 to 1 (1-0 logMAR) as a cut-off point.

RESULTS

The Lea Symbols test could be successfully used in 95.9% of the population. The most useful cut-off points for screening preschool children were found to be 0.8 (LR + 5.73, LR - 0.05) or 0.63 (LR + 11.7, LR - 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The Lea Symbols test proved to be clinically useful in detecting VA deficiency in preschool children. The choice between the two best performing cut-off levels should be made according to the expected cost-effectiveness of the screening programme.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用利雅视力表15行折叠距离视力表进行视力(VA)测试的可行性及其在检测学龄前儿童视力缺陷方面的诊断有效性。

方法

根据方法部分所述的测试方案,对149名年龄在38至54个月之间的儿童进行了视力检查,使用利雅15行折叠视标在3米的距离进行测试。视力测试后,对每个儿童进行了全面的眼科检查,包括散瞳验光、遮盖试验以及眼前段和眼后段检查,以检测任何可能威胁视力的眼部异常。通过标准程序计算利雅视力表测试的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比(LR+,LR-)以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以视力表从0.1到1(1-0 logMAR)的每个视力水平作为分界点。

结果

利雅视力表测试在95.9%的人群中可以成功使用。发现筛查学龄前儿童最有用的分界点是0.8(LR+5.73,LR-0.05)或0.63(LR+11.7,LR-0.23)。

结论

利雅视力表测试在检测学龄前儿童视力缺陷方面被证明具有临床实用性。应根据筛查计划预期的成本效益在两个表现最佳的分界水平之间做出选择。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity and specificity of a visual acuity screening protocol performed with the Lea Symbols 15-line folding distance chart in preschool children.使用利雅视力表15行折叠距离视力筛查方案在学龄前儿童中的敏感性和特异性。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Dec;84(6):807-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00668.x.
2
Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.在学龄前儿童视力研究中,由持牌眼保健专业人员进行的学龄前视力筛查测试的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):637-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.022.
3
Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.初步报告:使用利氏符号对幼儿进行检查。
Strabismus. 2000 Sep;8(3):209-13.
4
Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared with lay screeners in the vision in preschoolers study.在学龄前儿童视力研究中,由护士筛查人员进行的学龄前视力筛查测试与非专业筛查人员进行的测试对比。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Aug;46(8):2639-48. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0141.
5
Children unable to perform screening tests in vision in preschoolers study: proportion with ocular conditions and impact on measures of test accuracy.儿童无法在学龄前儿童视力筛查测试中进行测试:患有眼部疾病的比例及其对测试准确性指标的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):83-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0384.
6
Comparison of Lea Symbols chart and Sheridan Gardiner chart in assessing vision screening among pre-school children: a Malaysia perspective.从马来西亚视角比较利氏符号视力表与谢里登·加德纳视力表在学龄前儿童视力筛查中的应用
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Mar;95(3):412-7.
7
Is vision screening in 3-year-old children feasible? Comparison between the Lea Symbol chart and the HVOT (LM) chart.对3岁儿童进行视力筛查是否可行?Lea符号视力表与HVOT(LM)视力表的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Feb;83(1):76-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00367.x.
8
Comparison of preschool vision screening methods in a population with a high prevalence of astigmatism.散光高患病率人群中 preschool 视力筛查方法的比较 。 注:这里“preschool”在语境中可能不太准确,也许是“pre-school”(学前的),但按照要求未做修正。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Apr;42(5):917-24.
9
Performance of the Lea symbols chart for screening Nigerian children aged 3 to 5 years.用于筛查3至5岁尼日利亚儿童的利氏符号视力表的性能。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;23(10):1381-1386. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_204_19.
10
Low-contrast acuity measurement: does it add value in the visual assessment of down syndrome and cerebral palsy populations?低对比度视力测量:在唐氏综合征和脑瘫人群的视觉评估中是否有价值?
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 9;54(1):251-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10506.

引用本文的文献

1
The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.《弗赖堡幼儿敏锐度测试:测试性、重测变异性,以及与 LEA 符号的比较》
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.14.
2
Prevalence and associated factors of visual impairment among adults aged 40 and above in Southern Ethiopia, 2022.2022 年,在埃塞俄比亚南部,40 岁及以上成年人的视力障碍患病率及其相关因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53056-6.
3
Prevalence of Visual Impairment and Associated Factors Among Older Adults in Southern Ethiopia, 2022.
2022年埃塞俄比亚南部老年人视力障碍患病率及相关因素
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2024 Jan 4;16:1-16. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S440423. eCollection 2024.
4
Validation of the Waterloo Differential Visual Acuity Test (WatDAT) and Comparison With Existing Pediatric Tests of Visual Acuity.滑铁卢小儿远视力测试(WatDAT)的验证及其与现有儿童视力测试的比较。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 1;12(9):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.9.13.
5
Validity of vision screening program conducted by preschool teachers: An interventional study.由幼儿园教师开展的视力筛查项目的有效性:一项干预性研究。
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 1;11(1):1-10. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1439. eCollection 2022 Spring.
6
Pattern of comorbidities in school-aged children with cerebral palsy in Cross River State, Nigeria.尼日利亚克罗斯河州学龄期脑瘫儿童的合并症模式。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02637-9.
7
Comparison of the pediatric vision screening program in 18 countries across five continents.五大洲18个国家儿童视力筛查项目的比较。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 3;31(4):357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.07.006. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.萨格勒布弱视学龄前筛查研究:近视力和远视力测试提高了弱视筛查的诊断准确性。
Croat Med J. 2016 Feb;57(1):29-41. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.29.
9
Test Re-Test Reliability and Validity of Different Visual Acuity and Stereoacuity Charts Used in Preschool Children.用于学龄前儿童的不同视力和立体视图表的重测信度和效度
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):NC01-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14407.6747. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
10
The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.弱视筛查项目的潜在成本效益。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012 May-Jun;49(3):146-55; quiz 145, 156. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20110823-02. Epub 2011 Aug 30.