• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低对比度视力测量:在唐氏综合征和脑瘫人群的视觉评估中是否有价值?

Low-contrast acuity measurement: does it add value in the visual assessment of down syndrome and cerebral palsy populations?

机构信息

Vision Science Research Group, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 9;54(1):251-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10506.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.12-10506
PMID:23233262
Abstract

PURPOSE

Children with Down syndrome (DS) and cerebral palsy (CP) often have reduced visual acuity (VA). This study assessed VA and low-contrast acuity (LCA) with Lea symbols in DS and CP populations to explore whether LCA measures provide useful additional information about visual performance. VA and LCA were also measured in a large group of typically developing young people.

METHODS

High-contrast VA and LCA performance was measured monocularly using crowded Lea symbols with 45 young people with CP (mean age 11.8 ± 4 years), 44 with DS (mean age 10.5 ± 3 years), and 211 controls (mean age 11.4 ± 3 years). Refractive status was confirmed with cycloplegic retinoscopy.

RESULTS

DS AND CP GROUPS HAD SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER ACUITIES THAN CONTROLS AT ALL CONTRASTS (P 0.001). MEAN (SD) HIGH-CONTRAST VA WAS AS FOLLOWS: DS = +0.39 ± 0.2 logMAR; CP = +0.18 ± 0.2 logMAR; controls = -0.04 ± 0.1 logMAR. Mean 2.5% LCA was as follows: DS = +0.73 ± 0.2 logMAR; CP = +0.50 ± 0.2 logMAR; controls = +0.37 ± 0.1 logMAR. For controls, the mean difference between VA and 2.5% LCA was 0.40 logMAR (95% limits of agreement, ± 0.22 logMAR). While there was a positive relation between VA and 2.5% LCA scores (linear regressions, P < 0.0001), considerable variation existed, with VA explaining only 36% of the variance in LCA performance for control data.

CONCLUSIONS

VA and LCA performance was significantly poorer in DS and CP groups than in controls, and high-contrast VA did not reliably predict low-contrast performance. Therefore both high- and low-contrast acuity assessment are valuable to fully describe an individual's visual function, and this may be particularly relevant in DS and CP in cases in which patients are unable to articulate visual difficulties. Age-specific reference data from a large sample of typically developing young people across a broad age range are presented for clinicians using high- and low-contrast Lea symbols.

摘要

目的

唐氏综合征(DS)和脑瘫(CP)患儿常伴有视力(VA)降低。本研究采用 Lea 符号评估 DS 和 CP 人群的 VA 和低对比度视力(LCA),以探讨 LCA 测量值是否能为视觉表现提供有用的补充信息。此外,还在一大组发育正常的年轻人中测量了 VA 和 LCA。

方法

使用 45 名 CP 患者(平均年龄 11.8 ± 4 岁)、44 名 DS 患者(平均年龄 10.5 ± 3 岁)和 211 名对照组(平均年龄 11.4 ± 3 岁)的单眼拥挤 Lea 符号分别测量高对比度 VA 和 LCA。通过睫状肌麻痹检影验光确认屈光状态。

结果

与对照组相比,DS 和 CP 组在所有对比度下的视力均显著降低(P < 0.001)。高对比度 VA 的平均(标准差)值如下:DS = +0.39 ± 0.2 logMAR;CP = +0.18 ± 0.2 logMAR;对照组 = -0.04 ± 0.1 logMAR。2.5% LCA 的平均结果如下:DS = +0.73 ± 0.2 logMAR;CP = +0.50 ± 0.2 logMAR;对照组 = +0.37 ± 0.1 logMAR。对于对照组,VA 和 2.5% LCA 之间的平均差异为 0.40 logMAR(95%一致性界限,± 0.22 logMAR)。虽然 VA 和 2.5% LCA 评分之间存在正相关(线性回归,P < 0.0001),但存在很大差异,VA 仅能解释对照组 LCA 表现的 36%的变异性。

结论

DS 和 CP 组的 VA 和 LCA 表现明显低于对照组,高对比度 VA 并不能可靠地预测低对比度表现。因此,高对比度和低对比度视力评估对于全面描述个体的视觉功能都很有价值,在 CP 和 DS 患者无法表达视觉困难的情况下,这可能尤为相关。本研究为使用高对比度和低对比度 Lea 符号的临床医生提供了来自大样本发育正常的年轻人在广泛年龄范围内的年龄特异性参考数据。

相似文献

1
Low-contrast acuity measurement: does it add value in the visual assessment of down syndrome and cerebral palsy populations?低对比度视力测量:在唐氏综合征和脑瘫人群的视觉评估中是否有价值?
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 9;54(1):251-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10506.
2
Visual acuity and visually evoked responses in children with cerebral palsy: Gross Motor Function Classification Scale.脑瘫患儿的视力和视觉诱发电位:粗大运动功能分类量表
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;93(8):1068-72. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.156372. Epub 2009 May 7.
3
The impact of optical factors on resolution acuity in children with Down syndrome.光学因素对唐氏综合征患儿分辨力的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Sep;48(9):3995-4001. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1387.
4
Bifocals in Down Syndrome Study (BiDS): design and baseline visual function.唐氏综合征双焦点研究(BiDS):设计与基线视觉功能
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;86(3):196-207. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318196cd93.
5
Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters?测量视力——在中间视觉或明视觉条件下,以及使用高对比度或低对比度字母?
J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):S508-14.
6
Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.模拟屈光不正对儿科测试中成人视力的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jul;37(4):521-530. doi: 10.1111/opo.12387.
7
The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.对数最小分辨角(logMAR)凯氏图片测试与对数最小分辨角视力测试:一项对比研究。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Jan;23(1):85-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702990. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
8
Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.基于图片的视力表是否高估了视力?成人和儿童中凯氏图片、利氏符号、HOTV和基勒对数最小分辨角视力表与斯隆字母视力表的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170839. eCollection 2017.
9
The development & evaluation of two vision screening tools for correctable visual loss in older people.两种老年人可矫正视力损失视觉筛查工具的研发与评估。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Jul;32(4):332-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00919.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
10
Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool-aged children in Sydney.悉尼婴幼儿及学龄前儿童的正常视力
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;92(7):e521-9. doi: 10.1111/aos.12366. Epub 2014 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Fostering holistic eye care for children with special educational needs: an interprofessional education program bridging optometry and education.促进特殊教育需求儿童的整体眼保健:视光学与教育相结合的跨专业教育项目。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):1340. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06350-w.
2
Clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and initial management of cerebral visual impairment: a consensus practice guide.临床评估、检查、诊断和脑视觉损伤的初步管理:共识实践指南。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):1958-1965. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02261-6. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
3
Segmentation of the foveal and parafoveal retinal architecture using handheld spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in children with Down syndrome.
应用手持谱域光学相干断层扫描技术对唐氏综合征患儿的中心凹及旁中心凹视网膜结构进行分割。
Eye (Lond). 2022 May;36(5):963-968. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01883-6. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
One-year effects of bifocal and unifocal glasses on executive functions in children with Down syndrome in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验研究双焦眼镜和单焦眼镜对唐氏综合征儿童执行功能的一年影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96308-5.
5
Is the high contrast visual acuity chart a good predictor of improvement in visual acuity with low vision aids?高对比度视力表能否很好地预测低视力辅助器具对视力改善的效果?
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;69(7):1872-1875. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2625_20.
6
Quantitative Analysis of Retinal Structure and Function in Two Chromosomally Altered Mouse Models of Down Syndrome.唐氏综合征两种染色体重组小鼠模型的视网膜结构和功能的定量分析。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 May 11;61(5):25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.5.25.
7
Effects of bifocals on visual acuity in children with Down syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.双焦点眼镜对唐氏综合征儿童视力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;97(4):378-393. doi: 10.1111/aos.13944. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
8
Variability in Objective Refraction for Persons with Down Syndrome.唐氏综合征患者客观验光的变异性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 May;94(5):574-581. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001057.
9
Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome.唐氏综合征患者与非唐氏综合征患者模拟角膜曲率测量的重复性
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Nov;93(11):1356-1363. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000987.
10
Macular structural characteristics in children with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿的黄斑结构特征
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;253(12):2317-23. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3088-x. Epub 2015 Jul 2.