• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将知情且共同的决策付诸实践。

Putting informed and shared decision making into practice.

作者信息

Towle Angela, Godolphin William, Grams Garry, Lamarre Amanda

机构信息

Department of Medicine & Undergraduate Dean's Office, Faculty of Medicine and Division of Health Care Communication, College of Health Disciplines, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2006 Dec;9(4):321-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00404.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00404.x
PMID:17083559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060372/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the practice, experiences and views of motivated and trained family physicians as they attempt to implement informed and shared decision making (ISDM) in routine practice and to identify and understand the barriers they encounter.

BACKGROUND

Patient involvement in decision making about their health care has been the focus of much academic activity. Although significant conceptual and experimental work has been done, ISDM rarely occurs. Physician attitudes and lack of training are identified barriers.

DESIGN

Qualitative analysis of transcripts of consultations and key informant group interviews.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Six family physicians received training in the ISDM competencies. Audiotapes of office consultations were made before and after training. Transcripts of consultations were examined to identify behavioural markers associated with each competency and the range of expression of the competencies. The physicians attended group interviews at the end of the study to explore experiences of ISDM.

RESULTS

The physicians liked the ISDM model and thought that they should put it into practice. Evidence from transcripts indicated they were able to elicit concerns, ideas and expectations (although not about management) and agree an action plan. They did not elicit preferences for role or information. They sometimes offered choices. They had difficulty achieving full expression of any of the competencies and integrating ISDM into their script for the medical interview. The study also identified a variety of competency-specific barriers.

CONCLUSION

A major barrier to the practice of ISDM by motivated physicians appears to be the need to change well-established patterns of communication with patients.

摘要

目的

调查积极主动且训练有素的家庭医生在日常实践中尝试实施知情与共同决策(ISDM)的做法、经验和观点,并识别和理解他们遇到的障碍。

背景

患者参与自身医疗保健决策一直是众多学术活动的焦点。尽管已开展了大量概念性和实验性工作,但ISDM很少发生。医生的态度和缺乏培训被认为是障碍。

设计

对会诊记录和关键信息提供者小组访谈记录进行定性分析。

地点和参与者

六位家庭医生接受了ISDM能力培训。在培训前后录制了办公室会诊的录音带。对会诊记录进行检查,以识别与每种能力相关的行为标志以及能力的表达范围。在研究结束时,医生们参加了小组访谈,以探讨ISDM的经验。

结果

医生们喜欢ISDM模式,并认为他们应该将其付诸实践。记录中的证据表明,他们能够引出患者的担忧、想法和期望(尽管不是关于治疗管理方面的),并商定行动计划。他们没有引出患者对角色或信息的偏好。他们有时会提供选择。他们难以充分展现任何一种能力,也难以将ISDM融入他们的医学问诊流程中。该研究还识别出了各种特定于能力的障碍。

结论

积极主动的医生实施ISDM的一个主要障碍似乎是需要改变与患者既定的沟通模式。

相似文献

1
Putting informed and shared decision making into practice.将知情且共同的决策付诸实践。
Health Expect. 2006 Dec;9(4):321-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00404.x.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Evaluation of the quality of patient information to support informed shared decision-making.评估用于支持知情共同决策的患者信息质量。
Health Expect. 2001 Dec;4(4):235-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00144.x.
4
Implementation of shared decision-making in oncology: development and pilot study of a nurse-led decision-coaching programme for women with ductal carcinoma in situ.肿瘤学中共享决策的实施:一项护士主导的决策辅导方案在导管原位癌女性中的开发和试点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0548-8.
5
Informed shared decision making: An exploratory study in pharmacy.知情共同决策:药学领域的一项探索性研究。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2008 Apr;6(2):57-67. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552008000200001. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
6
Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者的知情共同决策项目:整群随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004.
7
Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: a mixed methods implementation study.为帮助临床医生与患者进行共同决策而准备的证据总结(决策框):一项混合方法实施研究。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 5;9:144. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0144-6.
8
Professional competencies in the changing health care system: physicians' views on the importance and adequacy of formal training in medical school.不断变化的医疗保健系统中的专业能力:医生对医学院校正规培训的重要性和充分性的看法。
Acad Med. 1995 Nov;70(11):1023-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199511000-00021.
9
Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation.探索医患双方对于会诊中风险沟通和共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):198-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00235.x.
10
Physician perspectives on Choosing Wisely Canada as an approach to reduce unnecessary medical care: a qualitative study.医生对选择明智加拿大作为减少不必要医疗的方法的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Sep 26;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0370-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Codesigning Online Continuing Medical Education on Social Health Integration and Social Risk-Informed Care for Primary Care Providers.在线共同设计初级保健提供者的社会健康整合和社会风险知情护理继续教育。
Perm J. 2024 Jun 14;28(2):26-35. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.113. Epub 2024 May 10.
2
Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions about the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study from a Virtual Community of Practice.医疗保健专业人员对基层医疗中实施共同决策的看法:一项来自虚拟实践社区的定性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Apr 16;24(2):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6554. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
3
Ideas, concerns, expectations, and effects on life (ICEE) in GP consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations.全科医疗会诊中的想法、担忧、期望及对生活的影响(ICEE):一项使用英国会诊视频记录的观察性研究
BJGP Open. 2023 Dec 19;7(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0008. Print 2023 Dec.
4
Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study.患者对哮喘诊断的看法以及临床决策支持系统如何提供帮助:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):307-317. doi: 10.1111/hex.13657. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol.设计并评估一种用于局部晚期或局部复发性直肠癌患者的患者决策辅助工具:一项全国多中心混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e056984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984.
6
SDM Training Modules for Health and Social Care Professionals in Israel.以色列针对健康与社会护理专业人员的共同决策培训模块。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 27;12:679036. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.679036. eCollection 2021.
7
Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient-Centered Web-Based Reproductive Decision Support Tool for Primary Care.开发并初步测试一个以患者为中心的基于网络的初级保健生殖决策支持工具。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):2989-2999. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06506-6. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Shared decision making in peri-operative medicine: Miles to go in Indian scenario.围手术期医学中的共同决策:印度的情况仍有很长的路要走。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul-Sep;36(3):316-324. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_250_19. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
9
Decision-Making Process in Comprehensive Medication Management Services: From the Understanding to the Development of a Theoretical Model.综合药物管理服务中的决策过程:从理解到理论模型的构建
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Oct 3;8(4):180. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040180.
10
Assessing data availability and quality within an electronic health record system through external validation against an external clinical data source.通过与外部临床数据源进行外部验证,评估电子健康记录系统中的数据可用性和质量。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 25;19(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0864-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the achievement of medical identity limit the ability of primary care practitioners to be patient-centred? A qualitative study.获得医学身份是否会限制基层医疗从业者以患者为中心的能力?一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jan;60(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.12.002. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
2
An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.医疗问诊中共同决策的整合模型。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
3
Shared decision making and risk communication in practice: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.实践中的共同决策与风险沟通:对全科医生经验的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jan;55(510):6-13.
4
Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress.共同医疗决策:问题、过程与进展
JAMA. 2004 Nov 24;292(20):2516-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.20.2516.
5
Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors' attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial.让患者参与决策并告知风险:一项关于医生在随机试验期间态度和信心的纵向评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):431-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00502.x.
6
The role of risk communication in shared decision making.风险沟通在共同决策中的作用。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):692-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.692.
7
Manufactured but not imported: new directions for research in shared decision making support and skills.
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 May;50(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00077-6.
8
Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.共同决策:开发用于衡量患者参与度的OPTION量表。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):93-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.93.
9
Patient centredness in the MRCGP video examination: analysis of large cohort. Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners.MRCGP视频考试中的以患者为中心:大型队列分析。皇家全科医师学院成员。
BMJ. 2002 Sep 28;325(7366):691-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.691.
10
Barriers to the evidence-based patient choice (EBPC) consultation.基于证据的患者选择(EBPC)咨询的障碍。
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Jun;47(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00198-7.