• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知过程的分层控制:按顺序切换任务。

Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.

作者信息

Schneider Darryl W, Logan Gordon D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):623-40. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.623.

DOI:10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.623
PMID:17087577
Abstract

Hierarchical control of cognitive processes was studied by examining the relationship between sequence- and task-level processing in the performance of explicit, memorized task sequences. In 4 experiments, switch costs in task-switching performance were perturbed by sequence initiation times that varied with sequence complexity, preparation time, and type of sequence transition (repetition or switch). Hierarchical control was inferred from these sequence initiation time effects and the recurrent finding of no switch cost at the first serial position across sequences, the point at which sequence-level processes are likely active in maintaining or instantiating a hierarchical control structure in working memory. These findings resonate with past research on motor programs and serial memory and provide new insights into the concepts of task set and control.

摘要

通过研究显性记忆任务序列执行过程中序列水平和任务水平加工之间的关系,对认知过程的分层控制进行了研究。在4个实验中,任务切换表现中的切换成本受到序列启动时间的干扰,序列启动时间随序列复杂性、准备时间和序列转换类型(重复或切换)而变化。从这些序列启动时间效应以及跨序列在第一个序列位置没有切换成本这一反复出现的发现中推断出分层控制,在这个位置,序列水平的过程可能在工作记忆中维持或实例化分层控制结构时处于活跃状态。这些发现与过去关于运动程序和序列记忆的研究相呼应,并为任务集和控制的概念提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.认知过程的分层控制:按顺序切换任务。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):623-40. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.623.
2
Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.在不切换任务的情况下模拟任务切换:对明确提示表现的短期启动解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):343-67. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343.
3
Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.任务切换中与线索无关的特定任务表征:来自逆向抑制的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):892-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.892.
4
Working memory costs of task switching.任务切换的工作记忆成本。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):478-94. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.478.
5
Voluntary task switching: chasing the elusive homunculus.自愿任务切换:追寻难以捉摸的小人儿。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):683-702. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.683.
6
Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.工作记忆中信息提取的速度与准确性:注意力转换的个体差异研究
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):616-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.616.
7
Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.任务切换与线索切换:运用转换线索来厘清任务切换表现中的序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):370-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.370.
8
Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?认知任务切换中的年龄相关差异:内部控制能力会随着年龄增长而下降吗?
Psychol Aging. 2008 Jun;23(2):330-41. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.330.
9
Implicit task sets in task switching?任务切换中的内隐任务集?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1221-33. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221.
10
How incidental sequence learning creates reportable knowledge: the role of unexpected events.偶发序列学习如何创造可报告的知识:意外事件的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Sep;34(5):1011-26. doi: 10.1037/a0012942.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context.跨模态情境下一致性序列效应的视觉优势
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1504068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504068. eCollection 2024.
2
Contextual control demands determine whether stability and flexibility trade off against each other.语境控制需求决定了稳定性和灵活性是否相互权衡。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2529-2551. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02955-x. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Cognitive sequences in obsessive-compulsive disorder are supported by frontal cortex ramping activity and mediated by symptom severity.
强迫症中的认知序列由额叶皮质的递增活动支持,并由症状严重程度介导。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 11:2024.07.28.605508. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.28.605508.
4
Abstract task sequence initiation deficit dissociates anxiety disorders from obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy controls.摘要任务序列启动缺陷可将焦虑障碍与强迫症和健康对照组区分开来。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec;24(6):1186-1201. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01207-7. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.任务转换控制中的双重任务:仅在较低层次的冲突与较高层次的任务组织过程之间存在边缘交互。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02876-9. Epub 2024 May 8.
6
Who is calling? Optimizing source identification from marmoset vocalizations with hierarchical machine learning classifiers.谁在打电话?使用分层机器学习分类器优化狨猴叫声的声源识别。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Oct;20(207):20230399. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0399. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
7
Chunking of Control: An Unrecognized Aspect of Cognitive Resource Limits.控制的组块化:认知资源限制中一个未被认识到的方面。
J Cogn. 2023 May 4;6(1):25. doi: 10.5334/joc.275. eCollection 2023.
8
The Higher, More Complicated: The Neural Mechanism of Hierarchical Task Switching on Prefrontal Cortex.层次越高,越复杂:前额叶皮层上层次任务切换的神经机制
Brain Sci. 2022 May 14;12(5):645. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050645.
9
No need to choose: Independent regulation of cognitive stability and flexibility challenges the stability-flexibility trade-off.无需取舍:认知稳定性和灵活性的独立调节挑战了稳定性-灵活性权衡。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3009-3027. doi: 10.1037/xge0001241. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Reward Value Enhances Sequence Monitoring Ramping Dynamics as Ending Rewards Approach in the Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex.奖赏值增强了终末奖赏临近时的序列监测上调动力学,该效应出现在额眶部前额皮质。
eNeuro. 2022 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0003-22.2022. Print 2022 Mar-Apr.