• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利他主义的演变:多级选择与广义适合度中的博弈论

The evolution of altruism: game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness.

作者信息

Fletcher Jeffrey A, Zwick Martin

机构信息

Systems Science Ph.D. Program, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 7;245(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.030. Epub 2006 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.030
PMID:17087973
Abstract

Although the prisoner's dilemma (PD) has been used extensively to study reciprocal altruism, here we show that the n-player prisoner's dilemma (NPD) is also central to two other prominent theories of the evolution of altruism: inclusive fitness and multilevel selection. An NPD model captures the essential factors for the evolution of altruism directly in its parameters and integrates important aspects of these two theories such as Hamilton's rule, Simpson's paradox, and the Price covariance equation. The model also suggests a simple interpretation of the Price selection decomposition and an alternative decomposition that is symmetrical and complementary to it. In some situations this alternative shows the temporal changes in within- and between-group selection more clearly than the Price equation. In addition, we provide a new perspective on strong vs. weak altruism by identifying their different underlying game structures (based on absolute fitness) and showing how their evolutionary dynamics are nevertheless similar under selection (based on relative fitness). In contrast to conventional wisdom, the model shows that both strong and weak altruism can evolve in periodically formed random groups of non-conditional strategies if groups are multigenerational. An integrative approach based on the NPD helps unify different perspectives on the evolution of altruism.

摘要

尽管囚徒困境(PD)已被广泛用于研究互惠利他行为,但在此我们表明,n 人囚徒困境(NPD)对于利他主义进化的另外两个重要理论也至关重要:亲缘选择和多层次选择。一个 NPD 模型直接在其参数中捕捉了利他主义进化的基本要素,并整合了这两个理论的重要方面,如汉密尔顿法则、辛普森悖论和普莱斯协方差方程。该模型还提出了对普莱斯选择分解的一种简单解释以及一种与其对称且互补的替代分解。在某些情况下,这种替代分解比普莱斯方程更清晰地展示了组内和组间选择的时间变化。此外,通过识别强弱利他主义不同的潜在博弈结构(基于绝对适合度)并展示它们在选择下(基于相对适合度)的进化动态如何相似,我们为强弱利他主义提供了一个新视角。与传统观点不同,该模型表明,如果群体是多代的,那么强弱利他主义都可以在周期性形成的无条件策略随机群体中进化。基于 NPD 的综合方法有助于统一关于利他主义进化的不同观点。

相似文献

1
The evolution of altruism: game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness.利他主义的演变:多级选择与广义适合度中的博弈论
J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 7;245(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.030. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
2
Unifying the theories of inclusive fitness and reciprocal altruism.统一广义适合度理论与互惠利他主义理论。
Am Nat. 2006 Aug;168(2):252-62. doi: 10.1086/506529. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
3
Effects of information and group structure on evolution of altruism: analysis of two-score model by covariance and contextual analyses.信息与群体结构对利他主义进化的影响:基于协方差和情境分析的双分数模型分析
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jan 21;232(2):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.08.006.
4
Hamilton's missing link.汉密尔顿的关键环节缺失。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Jun 7;246(3):551-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
5
The group selection controversy.群体选择争议。
J Evol Biol. 2010 Jan;23(1):6-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01876.x. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
6
Altruism may arise from individual selection.利他主义可能源于个体选择。
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jul 21;235(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.006. Epub 2005 Mar 5.
7
The evolution of altruism between siblings: Hamilton's rule revisited.兄弟姐妹间利他行为的演化:重新审视汉密尔顿法则
J Theor Biol. 2006 Aug 21;241(4):774-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
8
Modelling social evolution: the relative merits and limitations of a Hamilton's rule-based approach.社会进化建模:基于汉密尔顿法则方法的相对优点与局限性
J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1419-22; discussion 1426-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01144.x.
9
The paradox of cooperation benefits.合作收益悖论。
J Theor Biol. 2010 May 21;264(2):301-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
10
Mathematics of kin- and group-selection: formally equivalent?亲缘选择和群体选择的数学:形式上等同吗?
Evolution. 2010 Feb 1;64(2):316-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00899.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma games coevolving on adaptive networks.在自适应网络上共同进化的进化囚徒困境博弈
J Complex Netw. 2018 Feb;6(1):1-23. doi: 10.1093/comnet/cnx018. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
2
Multilevel processes and cultural adaptation: Examples from past and present small-scale societies.多层次过程与文化适应:来自过去和现在小规模社会的实例。
Ecol Soc. 2016 Dec;21(4). doi: 10.5751/ES-08561-210402.
3
Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?社会进化模型:我们能否更好地预测“谁帮助谁实现了什么”?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150088. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0088.
4
The emergence of cooperation from a single mutant during microbial life cycles.在微生物生命周期中单个突变体产生的合作现象。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Jul 6;12(108):20150171. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0171.
5
Impact of roles assignation on heterogeneous populations in evolutionary dictator game.角色分配对进化独裁者博弈中异质群体的影响。
Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 7;4:6937. doi: 10.1038/srep06937.
6
Public goods dilemma in asexual ant societies.无性蚂蚁社会中的公共物品困境。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 1;110(40):16056-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309010110. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
7
Manipulated into giving: when parasitism drives apparent or incidental altruism.被操纵的给予:寄生虫驱使明显或偶然的利他主义。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Mar 13;280(1758):20130108. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0108. Print 2013 May 7.
8
Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple Walk Away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups.在移动生物中合作是否可行?简单的“走开”规则有利于群体中合作行为的进化。
Evol Hum Behav. 2011 Jul;32(4):263-276. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.01.002.
9
Understanding microbial cooperation.理解微生物合作。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
10
Complexity: against systems.复杂性:针对系统。
Theory Biosci. 2011 Sep;130(3):229-45. doi: 10.1007/s12064-011-0121-4. Epub 2011 Feb 2.