• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲缘选择和群体选择的数学:形式上等同吗?

Mathematics of kin- and group-selection: formally equivalent?

机构信息

Emmy-Noether Group for Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology August-Thienemann-Strasse 2, 24306 Plön, Germany.

出版信息

Evolution. 2010 Feb 1;64(2):316-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00899.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00899.x
PMID:19929970
Abstract

Evolutionary game theory is a general mathematical framework that describes the evolution of social traits. This framework forms the basis of many multilevel selection models and is also frequently used to model evolutionary dynamics on networks. Kin selection, which was initially restricted to describe social interactions between relatives, has also led to a broader mathematical approach, inclusive fitness, that can not only describe social evolution among relatives, but also in group structured populations or on social networks. It turns out that the underlying mathematics of game theory is fundamentally different from the approach of inclusive fitness. Thus, both approaches-evolutionary game theory and inclusive fitness-can be helpful to understand the evolution of social traits in group structured or spatially extended populations.

摘要

进化博弈论是一个通用的数学框架,用于描述社会特征的演变。该框架构成了许多多层次选择模型的基础,也经常用于在网络上模拟进化动态。最初仅限于描述亲属之间社会互动的亲缘选择,也导致了更广泛的数学方法,即适合度,它不仅可以描述亲属之间的社会进化,还可以描述在具有群体结构的种群或社会网络中。事实证明,博弈论的基础数学与适合度的方法在根本上是不同的。因此,进化博弈论和适合度这两种方法都有助于理解具有群体结构或空间扩展的种群中社会特征的进化。

相似文献

1
Mathematics of kin- and group-selection: formally equivalent?亲缘选择和群体选择的数学:形式上等同吗?
Evolution. 2010 Feb 1;64(2):316-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00899.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
2
The evolution of altruism: game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness.利他主义的演变:多级选择与广义适合度中的博弈论
J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 7;245(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.030. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
3
Evolutionary games in Wright's island model: kin selection meets evolutionary game theory. Wright 岛模型中的进化博弈:亲缘选择与进化博弈论的交汇。
Evolution. 2010 Dec;64(12):3344-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01117.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
4
The different limits of weak selection and the evolutionary dynamics of finite populations.弱选择的不同界限与有限种群的进化动力学
J Theor Biol. 2007 Jul 21;247(2):382-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.03.015. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
5
Evolutionary dynamics of biological games.生物博弈的进化动力学
Science. 2004 Feb 6;303(5659):793-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1093411.
6
The evolution of helping and harming on graphs: the return of the inclusive fitness effect.图上帮助与伤害行为的演变:广义适合度效应的回归。
J Evol Biol. 2007 Nov;20(6):2284-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01414.x.
7
Unifying genetic and game theoretic models of kin selection for continuous traits.统一连续性状亲属选择的遗传模型和博弈论模型。
J Theor Biol. 1998 Oct 7;194(3):391-407. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0762.
8
From inclusive fitness to fixation probability in homogeneous structured populations.从广义适合度到同质结构化种群中的固定概率
J Theor Biol. 2007 Nov 7;249(1):101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
9
Toward evolutionary graphs with two sexes: a kin selection analysis of a sex allocation problem.走向具有两性的进化图:性别分配问题的亲缘选择分析。
J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1428-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01561.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
10
Group selection and kin selection: formally equivalent approaches.群体选择和亲属选择:形式上等效的方法。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jul;26(7):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary Games of Multiplayer Cooperation on Graphs.图上多人合作的进化博弈
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Aug 11;12(8):e1005059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005059. eCollection 2016 Aug.
2
Kin and multilevel selection in social evolution: a never-ending controversy?社会进化中的亲属选择和多层次选择:一场永无休止的争论?
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 28;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8018.1. eCollection 2016.
3
Relatedness predicts multiple measures of investment in cooperative nest construction in sociable weavers.亲缘关系可预测群居织巢鸟在合作筑巢中多种投资行为的指标。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015 Nov 1;69(11):1835-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1996-8. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
4
The emergence of cooperation from a single mutant during microbial life cycles.在微生物生命周期中单个突变体产生的合作现象。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Jul 6;12(108):20150171. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0171.
5
Evolutionary dynamics of n-player games played by relatives.亲属参与的n人博弈的进化动力学
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130359. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0359. Print 2014 May 19.
6
Altruism can proliferate through population viscosity despite high random gene flow.利他主义可以在高随机基因流动的情况下通过种群粘性而扩散。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e72043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072043. eCollection 2013.
7
Selection for altruism through random drift in variable size populations.通过在变大小种群中随机漂变选择利他主义。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 May 10;12:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-61.
8
Growth dynamics and the evolution of cooperation in microbial populations.微生物种群中的生长动态和合作进化。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:281. doi: 10.1038/srep00281. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
9
Understanding microbial cooperation.理解微生物合作。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
10
The evolution of eusociality.真社会性的进化。
Nature. 2010 Aug 26;466(7310):1057-62. doi: 10.1038/nature09205.