Mattox K L, Maningas P A, Moore E E, Mateer J R, Marx J A, Aprahamian C, Burch J M, Pepe P E
Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ann Surg. 1991 May;213(5):482-91. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199105000-00014.
The safety and efficacy of 7.5% sodium chloride in 6% dextran 70 (HSD) in posttraumatic hypotension was evaluated in Houston, Denver, and Milwaukee. Multicentered, blinded, prospective randomized studies were developed comparing 250 mL of HSD versus 250 mL of normal crystalloid solution administered before routine prehospital and emergency center resuscitation. During a 13-month period, 422 patients were enrolled, 211 of whom subsequently underwent operative procedures. Three hundred fifty-nine patients met criteria for efficacy analysis, 51% of whom were in the HSD group. Seventy-two per cent of all patients were victims of penetrating trauma. The mean injury severity score (19), Trauma Score plus Injury Severity Score (TRISS) probability of survival, revised trauma scores (5.9), age, ambulance times, preinfusion blood pressure, and etiology distribution were identical between groups. The total amount of fluid administered, white blood cell count, arterial blood gases, potassium, or bicarbonate also were identical between groups. The HSD group had an improved blood pressure (p = 0.024). Hematocrit, sodium chloride, and osmolality levels were significantly elevated in the Emergency Center. Although no difference in overall survival was demonstrated, the HSD group requiring surgery did have a better survival (p = 0.02), with some variance among centers. The HSD group had fewer complications that the standard treatment group (7 versus 24). A greater incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome, renal failure, and coagulopathy occurred in the standard treatment group. No anaphylactoid nor Dextran-related coagulopathies occurred in the HSD group. Although this trial demonstrated trends supportive of HSD in hypotensive hemorrhagic shock patients requiring surgery, a larger sample size will be required to establish which subgroups of trauma patients might maximally benefit from the prehospital use of a small volume of hyperosmolar solution. This study demonstrates the safety of administering 250 mL 7.5% HDS to this group of patients.
在休斯顿、丹佛和密尔沃基对7.5%氯化钠6%右旋糖酐70(高渗盐右旋糖酐溶液,HSD)用于创伤后低血压的安全性和有效性进行了评估。开展了多中心、双盲、前瞻性随机研究,比较在院前和急诊中心常规复苏前给予250 mL HSD与250 mL普通晶体溶液的效果。在13个月期间,共纳入422例患者,其中211例随后接受了手术。359例患者符合疗效分析标准,其中51%在HSD组。所有患者中有72%为穿透性创伤受害者。两组之间的平均损伤严重度评分(19)、创伤评分加损伤严重度评分(TRISS)生存概率、修订创伤评分(5.9)、年龄、救护车运送时间、输注前血压和病因分布均相同。两组之间给予的液体总量、白细胞计数、动脉血气、钾或碳酸氢盐也相同。HSD组血压有所改善(p = 0.024)。急诊中心的血细胞比容、氯化钠和渗透压水平显著升高。虽然总体生存率无差异,但需要手术的HSD组生存率更高(p = 0.02),各中心之间存在一定差异。HSD组的并发症少于标准治疗组(分别为7例和24例)。标准治疗组发生成人呼吸窘迫综合征、肾衰竭和凝血病的发生率更高。HSD组未发生类过敏反应或与右旋糖酐相关的凝血病。虽然该试验显示了支持HSD用于需要手术的低血压失血性休克患者的趋势,但需要更大样本量来确定哪些创伤患者亚组可能从院前使用少量高渗溶液中最大程度获益。本研究证明了对该组患者给予250 mL 7.5% HDS的安全性。