• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士超级用户的识别与概念化

Identification and conceptualization of nurse super users.

作者信息

Boffa Daniel P, Pawola Lawrence M

机构信息

University of Illinois, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006 Fall;20(4):60-8.

PMID:17091792
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify super users from the general nursing population of clinical information systems users. Q-methodology was employed to identify and categorize the viewpoints of the nurses toward the use of these systems. Four factors that represented different views regarding the use of clinical information systems were extracted. This study identifies super users'perception and attitude toward the use of clinical information systems in the workplace. The current literature reflects a weak semantic structure for the term. Thus, the study assists with defining the term "super user." Healthcare organizations can use this information to identify individuals who have the ability and attitude to function as a super user. These individuals can be more accurately and efficiently extracted from a general registered nurse population to give them more extensive training and to strategically position them within clinical operations.

摘要

本研究的目的是从临床信息系统用户的普通护理人群中识别超级用户。采用Q方法来识别护士对这些系统使用的观点并进行分类。提取了代表临床信息系统使用不同观点的四个因素。本研究确定了超级用户在工作场所对临床信息系统使用的认知和态度。当前文献反映出该术语的语义结构薄弱。因此,本研究有助于定义“超级用户”这一术语。医疗保健组织可以利用这些信息来识别有能力且有态度担任超级用户的个人。这些个人可以从普通注册护士群体中更准确、高效地挑选出来,以便为他们提供更广泛的培训,并将他们战略性地安置在临床运营中。

相似文献

1
Identification and conceptualization of nurse super users.护士超级用户的识别与概念化
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006 Fall;20(4):60-8.
2
The relationship between super users' attitudes and employee experiences with clinical information systems.超级用户的态度与员工使用临床信息系统的体验之间的关系。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1):82-96. doi: 10.1177/1077558708325984. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
3
A study of the informatics literacy of clinical nurses in Taiwan.台湾临床护士信息素养的研究。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):290-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304836.70133.d1.
4
The perfect role for nursing informatics: Nursing staff development.护理信息学的完美角色:护理人员发展。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:241-3.
5
A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.对高级执业护士如何使用临床决策支持系统的定性分析。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):652-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00266.x.
6
Nurses' requirements for information technology in the next millennium.护士对下一个千年信息技术的需求。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;52 Pt 2:1314-7.
7
Two-stage evaluation of the impact of a nursing information system in Taiwan.
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Oct;77(10):698-707. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 May 5.
8
Nurses' experiences using a nursing information system: early stage of technology implementation.护士使用护理信息系统的体验:技术实施的早期阶段
Comput Inform Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):294-300. doi: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000289166.61863.0b.
9
The changing nature of nursing work in rural and small community hospitals.农村及小型社区医院护理工作性质的变化
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jan-Mar;9(1):1089. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
10
Case study: factors in defining the nurse informatics specialist role.案例研究:界定护理信息学专家角色的因素
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006 Spring;20(2):30-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change.学习智能体(超级用户)选择标准及技术变革实施中责任分配的心理学调查
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 15;13:928217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928217. eCollection 2022.
2
Nursing Home Implementation of Health Information Technology: Review of the Literature Finds Inadequate Investment in Preparation, Infrastructure, and Training.养老院健康信息技术的实施:文献综述发现准备工作、基础设施和培训方面投资不足。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018778902. doi: 10.1177/0046958018778902.
3
The Case for Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Evidence-Based Programming for Population Outcomes in Diabetes.
改善糖尿病群体健康的理由:基于证据的糖尿病群体结局规划。
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Jul;17(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0875-2.
4
A mixed methods study of how clinician 'super users' influence others during the implementation of electronic health records.一项关于临床医生“超级用户”在电子健康记录实施过程中如何影响他人的混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 10;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0154-6.
5
Feasibility analysis of the value of Q method in the classification and understanding of expert experience.Q 方法在专家经验分类和理解中的价值的可行性分析。
Chin J Integr Med. 2013 Nov;19(11):869-73. doi: 10.1007/s11655-012-1174-z. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
6
Implementing and evaluating a multicomponent inpatient diabetes management program: putting research into practice.实施和评估多组分住院糖尿病管理项目:将研究应用于实践
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 May;38(5):195-206. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38025-2.