• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与研究可改善参与中心的治疗策略和个体患者护理。

Study participation improves treatment strategies and individual patient care in participating centers.

作者信息

Janni W, Kiechle M, Sommer H, Rack B, Gauger K, Heinrigs M, Steinfeld D, Augustin D, Simon W, Harbeck N, Friese K

机构信息

Frauenklinik Innenstadt of the LMU Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5B):3661-7.

PMID:17094382
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ADEBAR study is a prospective multicenter Phase III trial to examine whether high-risk breast cancer patients > or =4 involved axillary lymph nodes) benefit from a sequential anthracycline-docetaxel regimen compared to standard chemotherapy with anthracyclines. With a median recruitment of 33 patients per month at 198 actively-recruiting centers, the ADEBAR study was the best recruiting study in Germany until the end of the trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standardized questionnaire was sent to all participating centers in order to determine the extent to which treatment strategies and patient care are affected by participation in the ADEBAR study. The questionnaire covered 5 areas of interest: previous inclusion of patients at the same tumor stage in other studies, the type of chemotherapy received by comparable patients previously outside the study, change in the intensity of medical care since participating in the ADEBAR study, the information gained through participation in the study and changes in the overall quality of medical care.

RESULTS

51.0% (n=98) of the questionnaires were returned, from which 3 were excluded from the analysis due to being incomplete. In the year preceding the ADEBAR study, 63.2% of participating centers had not entered their high-risk patients into a clinical trial. Before participating in the ADEBAR protocol, 44.2% of patients with the same indication had received inadequate therapy by today's standards, such as CMF, EC/CMF or 4x EC. 59.0% of the centers noted an increase in the intensity of patient care as a result of participation in the study, independent of the care provided purely because of the study. By being part of a research network, with a regular flow of information via newsletters, study meetings and the like, 80.0% noted an improvement in their professional knowledge in the field of breast cancer. Moreover, 31.6% of the centers reported an improvement in the overall quality of their patient care since the start of the trial.

CONCLUSION

The results of the survey demonstrate that both physicians and patients benefit from participation in clinical trials as this is associated with optimized decision-making as regards therapy and patient care.

摘要

背景

ADEBAR研究是一项前瞻性多中心III期试验,旨在研究高危乳腺癌患者(腋窝淋巴结转移≥4个)与接受蒽环类药物标准化疗相比,序贯使用蒽环类药物和多西他赛方案是否更有益。在198个积极招募患者的中心,每月平均招募33名患者,直到试验结束,ADEBAR研究一直是德国招募情况最好的研究。

材料与方法

向所有参与中心发送一份标准化问卷,以确定参与ADEBAR研究对治疗策略和患者护理的影响程度。问卷涵盖5个感兴趣的领域:之前其他研究中相同肿瘤分期患者的纳入情况、之前研究外类似患者接受的化疗类型、自参与ADEBAR研究以来医疗护理强度的变化、通过参与研究获得的信息以及医疗护理总体质量的变化。

结果

共收回51.0%(n = 98)的问卷,其中3份因不完整被排除在分析之外。在进行ADEBAR研究的前一年,63.2%的参与中心未将其高危患者纳入临床试验。在参与ADEBAR方案之前,按照如今的标准,44.2%具有相同适应症的患者接受了不充分的治疗,如CMF、EC/CMF或4x EC。59.0%的中心指出,参与研究后患者护理强度有所增加,这与纯粹因研究而提供的护理无关。通过成为研究网络的一部分,通过时事通讯、研究会议等定期信息流,80.0%的中心指出其在乳腺癌领域的专业知识有所提高。此外,31.6%的中心报告自试验开始以来患者护理的总体质量有所提高。

结论

调查结果表明,医生和患者都能从参与临床试验中受益,因为这与治疗和患者护理方面的优化决策相关。

相似文献

1
Study participation improves treatment strategies and individual patient care in participating centers.参与研究可改善参与中心的治疗策略和个体患者护理。
Anticancer Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5B):3661-7.
2
Cost analysis comparing an anthracycline/docetaxel regimen to CMF in patients with early stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者中蒽环类/多西他赛方案与CMF方案的成本分析比较。
Onkologie. 2009 Sep;32(8-9):473-81. doi: 10.1159/000226211. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
3
Adjuvant capecitabine, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and epirubicin for early breast cancer: final analysis of the randomized FinXX trial.卡培他滨、多西他赛、环磷酰胺和表柔比星辅助治疗早期乳腺癌:FinXX 试验的最终随机分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 1;30(1):11-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.4639. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
4
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
5
Capecitabine in addition to anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer: phase III GeparQuattro study.卡培他滨联合蒽环类和紫杉类药物新辅助治疗原发性乳腺癌患者的 III 期 GeparQuattro 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 20;28(12):2015-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8303. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
6
Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5.比较环磷酰胺、表柔比星和氟尿嘧啶与环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶用于绝经前淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性的随机试验:加拿大国家癌症研究所临床试验组MA5试验的更新
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5166-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.423.
7
Long-term benefit of high-dose epirubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: 15-year efficacy results of the Belgian multicentre study.高剂量表柔比星在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌辅助化疗中的长期获益:比利时多中心研究的15年疗效结果
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):720-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2155. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
8
Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with rotational CMF, epirubicin and vincristine as primary chemotherapy in operable breast carcinoma.一项随机试验,比较环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF)与交替使用CMF、表柔比星和长春新碱作为可手术乳腺癌的一线化疗方案。
Cancer. 2002 Jul 15;95(2):228-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10678.
9
Adjuvant chemotherapy with sequential or concurrent anthracycline and docetaxel: Breast International Group 02-98 randomized trial.序贯或同步使用蒽环类药物和多西他赛的辅助化疗:国际乳腺癌研究组02-98随机试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jan 16;100(2):121-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm287. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
10
HER-2 amplification and topoisomerase IIalpha gene aberrations as predictive markers in node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated either with an anthracycline-based therapy or with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil.HER-2扩增和拓扑异构酶IIα基因畸变作为预测标志物,用于接受蒽环类药物为基础的治疗或环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶随机治疗的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者。
Clin Cancer Res. 2002 May;8(5):1107-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientific output and organizational characteristics in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter cross-sectional study.巴西重症监护病房的科研产出与组织特征:一项多中心横断面研究。
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Dec 2;36:e20240006en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240006-en. eCollection 2024.
2
If health organisations and staff engage in research, does healthcare improve? Strengthening the evidence base through systematic reviews.如果健康组织和工作人员参与研究,医疗保健是否会得到改善?通过系统评价加强证据基础。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01187-7.
3
Quality of life of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after FOLFIRINOX treatment.
局部晚期胰腺癌患者接受 FOLFIRINOX 治疗后的生活质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Mar;30(3):2407-2415. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06648-1. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
The relationship between clinical trial accrual volume and outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia: A SWOG/ECOG-ACRIN study (S0106 and E1900).临床试验入组数量与急性髓系白血病结局的关系:SWOG/ECOG-ACRIN 研究(S0106 和 E1900)。
Leuk Res. 2019 Mar;78:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
5
Ethical challenges involved in obtaining consent for research from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房住院患者中获取研究同意书所涉及的伦理挑战。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S41. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.42.
6
Future of translational research: Why go pragmatic?转化研究的未来:为何要采用务实的方法?
Pragmat Obs Res. 2011 Feb 7;2:1-4. doi: 10.2147/POR.S15360. eCollection 2011.
7
Participation in the SUCCESS-A Trial Improves Intensity and Quality of Care for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer.参与SUCCESS-A试验可提高原发性乳腺癌患者的护理强度和质量。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Jan;73(1):63-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328147.
8
Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.提高临床医生参与随机对照试验的招募活动:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2012 Jan 6;2(1):e000496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000496. Print 2012.
9
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review.患者的医疗从业者或医疗机构参与临床试验的影响:系统评价。
Trials. 2011 Jan 20;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-16.
10
Clinical research methodology I: introduction to randomized trials.临床研究方法学I:随机试验介绍
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.10.003.