• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮扩张气管切开术

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.

作者信息

Koksal G M, Sayilgan N C, Oz H

机构信息

Dept of Anaesth. & Reanimation, Istanbul Univ., Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;18(5):903-10.

PMID:17094527
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the rate, timing, the incidence of complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and its effects by on nosocomial pneumonia.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of 104 patients (56 males, 48 females) > or = 18 years (54 +/- 19) who had undergone a PDT for respiratory failure during the five years 1998-2003.

RESULTS

Among 238 patients requiring mechanical ventilation > or = 48 hours, 104 (43.7%) required PDT. PDT was performed after 4.3 +/- 2.3 days of ventilation and the disconnection from mechanical ventilation was 13.6 +/- 8.5 days. Lower airway tract infection was detected in 88 patients: 55 patients (62.5%) before PDT and in 33 patients (37.5%) after PDT. The nosocomial pneumonia was observed after 5.9 +/- 1.67 days of ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PDT was performed relatively early, with an acceptable complication rate and that our post-PDT nosocomial pneumonia incidence is low.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)的实施率、时机、并发症发生率及其对医院获得性肺炎的影响。

方法

本研究对1998年至2003年期间因呼吸衰竭接受PDT治疗的104例年龄≥18岁(54±19岁)患者(56例男性,48例女性)进行回顾性分析。

结果

在238例需要机械通气≥48小时的患者中,104例(43.7%)需要进行PDT。PDT在通气4.3±2.3天后进行,脱机时间为13.6±8.5天。88例患者检测到下呼吸道感染:55例(62.5%)在PDT前,33例(37.5%)在PDT后。医院获得性肺炎在通气5.9±1.67天后出现。

结论

我们的结果表明,PDT实施相对较早,并发症发生率可接受,且PDT后医院获得性肺炎的发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.经皮扩张气管切开术
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;18(5):903-10.
2
Safety and Efficiency of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy With Direct Bronchoscopic Guidance for Thoracic Transplant Recipients.直接支气管镜引导下经皮扩张气管切开术在胸段移植受者中的安全性和有效性
Respir Care. 2016 Feb;61(2):235-42. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04128. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3
Weaning from ventilator after cardiac operation using the Ciaglia percutaneous tracheostomy.心脏手术后使用Ciaglia经皮气管切开术进行呼吸机撤机。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Apr;25(4):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.12.015.
4
Early versus late percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients anticipated requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.预期需要长时间机械通气的危重症患者行早期与晚期经皮扩张气管切开术的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Jun;125(11):1925-30.
5
Weaning of long-term mechanically-ventilated patients following video bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.视频支气管镜引导下经皮扩张气管切开术后长期机械通气患者的撤机
Chang Gung Med J. 2005 Dec;28(12):829-36.
6
[Tracheotomy - surgical and percutaneous].[气管切开术——外科手术及经皮气管切开术]
Zentralbl Chir. 2015 Jun;140(3):339-58; quiz 359-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546135. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
7
Safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with direct bronchoscopic guidance for solid organ allograft recipients.直接支气管镜引导下经皮扩张气管切开术在实体器官移植受者中的安全性
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Dec;82(12):1502-8. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)61094-X.
8
Percutaneous dilational and surgical tracheostomy in burn patients: incidence of complications and dysphagia.烧伤患者经皮扩张和手术气管切开术:并发症和吞咽困难的发生率。
Burns. 2014 May;40(3):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
9
Repeat percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in an awake and unintubated patient.在清醒且未插管的患者中重复经皮扩张气管切开术。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Mar;51(3):378-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01236.x. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
10
A comparison of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy.经皮扩张气管切开术与传统外科气管切开术的比较
Pneumologie. 2014 May;68(5):322-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365198. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Antibiotic Therapy during Bedside Percutaneous Tracheotomy procedure in an Intensive Care.重症监护病房床边经皮气管切开术中抗生素治疗的影响
J Acute Med. 2017 Mar 1;7(1):24-30. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.2017.0701.004.
2
Dilatational Percutaneous vs Surgical TracheoStomy in IntEnsive Care UniT: A Practice Pattern Observational Multicenter Study (DISSECT).重症监护病房中扩张性经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的比较:一项实践模式观察性多中心研究(DISSECT)
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;24(7):514-526. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23441.
3
Our Experience with Percutaneous and Surgical Tracheotomy in Intubated Critically Ill Patients.
我们对插管重症患者进行经皮和外科气管切开术的经验。
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Dec;56(4):199-205. doi: 10.5152/tao.2018.3603. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
4
Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy in Non-ICU Patients.非重症监护病房患者床边经皮气管切开术与开放性外科气管切开术的比较
Crit Care Res Pract. 2014;2014:156814. doi: 10.1155/2014/156814. Epub 2014 Jan 12.