非重症监护病房患者床边经皮气管切开术与开放性外科气管切开术的比较
Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy in Non-ICU Patients.
作者信息
Brotfain Evgeni, Koyfman Leonid, Frenkel Amit, Semyonov Michael, Peiser Jochanan G, Hayun-Maman Hagit, Boyko Matthew, Gruenbaum Shaun E, Zlotnik Alexander, Klein Moti
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Soroka Medical Center, Sderot Rager, Beer Sheva 84100, Israel.
Department of Medical Management, Soroka Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
出版信息
Crit Care Res Pract. 2014;2014:156814. doi: 10.1155/2014/156814. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
Abstract
Percutaneous bedside tracheostomy (PBT) is a one of the common and safe procedures in intensive care units through the world. In the present paper we published our clinical experience with a performance of PBTs in the regular ward by intensive care physicians' team. We found it safe and similar outcome in comparison to open surgical tracheostomy method in operation room by ENT team. The performance of PBT in the regular ward showed potential economic advantages in saving medical staff and operating room resources.
摘要
经皮床边气管切开术（PBT）是全球重症监护病房中常见且安全的手术之一。在本文中，我们发表了重症医学医师团队在普通病房进行PBT的临床经验。我们发现，与耳鼻喉科团队在手术室进行的开放性手术气管切开术相比，PBT安全且效果相似。在普通病房进行PBT在节省医护人员和手术室资源方面显示出潜在的经济优势。
相似文献
1
Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy in Non-ICU Patients.非重症监护病房患者床边经皮气管切开术与开放性外科气管切开术的比较
Crit Care Res Pract. 2014;2014:156814. doi: 10.1155/2014/156814. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
2
Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis.开放性与经皮扩张气管切开术：疗效与成本分析
Am Surg. 2001 Apr;67(4):297-301; discussion 301-2.
3
An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.开放手术与经皮气管切开术的时间及人员利用情况分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;128(1):109-14. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2003.18.
4
Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的安全性及成本比较。
Am Surg. 2001 Jan;67(1):54-60.
5
Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy.重症监护病房中的床边气管切开术：一项比较开放手术气管切开术与内镜引导下经皮扩张气管切开术的前瞻性随机试验。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Mar;111(3):494-500. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200103000-00021.
6
Cost Analysis of Open Surgical Bedside Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit Patients.重症监护病房患者开放式手术床边气管切开术的成本分析。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2023 Aug;102(8):516-521. doi: 10.1177/01455613211018578. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
8
Safety and complications of percutaneous tracheostomy in a cohort of 800 mixed ICU patients.800例综合重症监护病房患者经皮气管切开术的安全性及并发症
Anaesthesia. 2008 Nov;63(11):1198-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05606.x. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
9
Comparison of open versus bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the cardiothoracic surgical patient: outcomes and financial analysis.心胸外科手术患者开放性与床旁经皮扩张气管切开术的比较：结果与财务分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jun;79(6):1879-85. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.042.
10
Benefits of Bedside Open Tracheostomy: A Safe and Cost-Effective Alternative to the Operating Room.床边开放式气管切开术的益处：一种安全且具成本效益的手术室替代方案。
Head Neck. 2025 Feb;47(2):635-639. doi: 10.1002/hed.27948. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
引用本文的文献
1
High-Riding Innominate Artery: Booby Trap for ICU Tracheotomy.高位无名动脉：重症监护病房气管切开术的陷阱
Laryngoscope. 2025 Feb;135(2):626-628. doi: 10.1002/lary.31769. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Comparison of percutaneous single-stage dilatational tracheostomy and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.危重症患者经皮单阶段扩张气管切开术与外科气管切开术的比较：一项随机对照试验
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_53_23. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations.成人重症监护病房中的气管切开术：国际重症监护医学学会专家小组实践建议
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(Suppl 1):S31-S42. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-G23184.
4
Our Experience with Percutaneous and Surgical Tracheotomy in Intubated Critically Ill Patients.我们对插管重症患者进行经皮和外科气管切开术的经验。
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Dec;56(4):199-205. doi: 10.5152/tao.2018.3603. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
本文引用的文献
1
Does space make waste? The influence of ICU bed capacity on admission decisions.空间会导致浪费吗？重症监护病房床位容量对收治决策的影响。
Crit Care. 2013 May 8;17(3):315. doi: 10.1186/cc12688.
2
Predictors of mortality of mechanically ventilated patients in internal medicine wards.内科病房机械通气患者的死亡率预测因素。
J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
3
Medical and economic implications of prolonged mechanical ventilation and expedited post-acute care.机械通气时间延长和加速急性后期医疗护理的医学和经济意义。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):357-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321985. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
4
Weaning from mechanical ventilation.机械通气撤离。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;25(1):42-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834e6430.
5
When is surgical tracheostomy indicated? Surgical "U-shaped" versus percutaneous tracheostomy.何时需要进行外科气管切开术？外科“U形”气管切开术与经皮气管切开术的比较。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;17(1):29-32. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.09.01477.
6
Can intensive care physicians safely perform percutaneous dilational tracheostomy? An analysis of 207 cases.重症监护医师能否安全地实施经皮扩张气管切开术？207例病例分析。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Oct;9(10):717-9.
7
Mechanical ventilation of patients hospitalized in medical wards vs the intensive care unit--an observational, comparative study.内科病房与重症监护病房住院患者的机械通气——一项观察性比较研究。
J Crit Care. 2007 Mar;22(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.06.004. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
8
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.经皮扩张气管切开术
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;18(5):903-10.
9
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.危重症患者经皮扩张气管切开术与外科气管切开术的比较：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R55. doi: 10.1186/cc4887.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation.对接受人工通气的成年患者气管切开术时机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2005 May 28;330(7502):1243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38467.485671.E0. Epub 2005 May 18.
Zotero 插件