• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较改良无管经皮肾镜取石术带尾支架与经皮肾造瘘术带细管的随机试验。

Randomized trial comparing modified tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tailed stent with percutaneous nephrostomy with small-bore tube.

作者信息

Choi Michael, Brusky John, Weaver John, Amantia Monica, Bellman Gary C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):766-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.766.

DOI:10.1089/end.2006.20.766
PMID:17094752
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent trials using smaller percutaneous catheters as well as "tubeless" percutaneous technique have attempted to reduce postoperative analgesia requirements and the morbidity of a traditional large-bore nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We performed a randomized trial comparing tubeless procedures and use of small catheters to elucidate any differences in perioperative parameters, postoperative discomfort, complications, convalescence, and CT scan findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive patients underwent randomization into tubeless (using a tailed 6F double-J stent) and small tube (using an 8.2 pigtail nephrostomy tube) (N = 12 each). A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis without contrast was obtained the morning of the first postoperative day. Morphine equivalents and a visual analog pain score, as well as questionnaires for convalescence at the postoperative check, postoperative day 1, time of tube removal (3-5 days), and 1-week follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean pain scores and morphine requirements for the tubeless and small-tube groups at postoperative day 0, postoperative day 1, time of stent removal, and 10 days were not significantly different. Convalescence significantly favored stented patients. The CT findings were equivalent. Three patients had inadvertent dislodgment of their stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Tubeless and small-bore procedures cause similar postoperative discomfort, with indwelling stents appearing to quicken return to normal activities. Tailed stents may not be appropriate for all patients.

摘要

背景与目的

近期使用更细的经皮导管以及“无管”经皮技术的试验试图减少经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后术后镇痛需求以及传统大口径肾造瘘管的发病率。我们进行了一项随机试验,比较无管手术和使用细导管,以阐明围手术期参数、术后不适、并发症、康复情况及CT扫描结果的任何差异。

患者与方法

连续24例患者被随机分为无管组(使用带尾6F双J支架)和细管组(使用8.2猪尾肾造瘘管)(每组N = 12)。术后第一天上午进行腹部和盆腔非增强CT扫描。记录术后检查、术后第1天、拔管时(3 - 5天)及1周随访时的吗啡等效剂量、视觉模拟疼痛评分以及康复问卷。

结果

无管组和细管组在术后第0天、术后第1天、支架取出时及10天时的平均疼痛评分和吗啡需求量无显著差异。康复情况明显有利于带支架的患者。CT检查结果相当。3例患者的支架意外移位。

结论

无管和细口径手术引起的术后不适相似,留置支架似乎能加快恢复正常活动。带尾支架可能并非适用于所有患者。

相似文献

1
Randomized trial comparing modified tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tailed stent with percutaneous nephrostomy with small-bore tube.比较改良无管经皮肾镜取石术带尾支架与经皮肾造瘘术带细管的随机试验。
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):766-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.766.
2
A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.无管与标准经皮肾镜取石术的随机对照研究
J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):439-42. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0118.
3
Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost.完全无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:临床结果与成本分析
J Endourol. 2014 Dec;28(12):1487-94. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0421.
4
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid?无管经皮肾镜取石术:其并发症真的更少吗?
J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):427-34. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0269.
5
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with reversed Polaris Loop stent: reduced postoperative pain and narcotic use.采用逆向北极星环支架的无管经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL):减轻术后疼痛及减少麻醉药物使用
J Endourol. 2008 Oct;22(10):2245-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.9723.
6
A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tubeless.一项评估经皮肾镜取石术后肾造瘘引流类型的随机试验:细孔引流与无管引流。
J Endourol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1433-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0350.
7
Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.完全无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:一项随机临床试验
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(4):e4878. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154878. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
8
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy using antegrade tether: a randomized study.顺行牵引法无管经皮肾镜取石术:一项随机研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):644-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0693. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
9
Safety and Effectiveness of Externalized Ureteral Catheter in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.外置输尿管导管在无管经皮肾镜取石术中的安全性和有效性
Urol J. 2019 Aug 17;17(5):456-461. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5280.
10
A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.肾造瘘术与无管经皮肾镜取石术的随机对照试验
J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):612-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.020. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain management in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - an approach rooted in pathophysiology.经皮肾镜取石术中的疼痛管理——一种基于病理生理学的方法。
Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Jan 13. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00973-w.
2
Comparative analysis of re-entry malecot and nelaton catheters after standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adult patients: a cross-sectional study.经皮肾镜取石术后标准通道下使用 Re-entry 男性导尿管和 Nelaton 导管的比较分析:一项横断面研究。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Aug 24;51(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01475-x.
3
Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones.
完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和有管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD012607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2.
4
Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.经皮肾镜取石术中无管与肾造瘘管的并发症和结局:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):511-522. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis.无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术:一项更新的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2.
6
Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.全无管、无管、小口径造瘘管及标准经皮肾镜取石术的术中及术后可行性与安全性:一项对16项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Urol. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x.
7
Modified totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is it an effective and safe treatment option for renal and upper ureteral stones?改良完全无管经皮肾镜取石术:它是治疗肾及输尿管上段结石的有效且安全的选择吗?
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016;11(4):240-246. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.64447. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
8
An unusual cause of Grade IIIb Clavien complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Broken and retained Malecot nephrostomy catheter.经皮肾镜取石术Ⅲb级Clavien并发症的罕见原因:麦利氏肾造瘘导管断裂并残留
Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 Mar-Apr;10(3-4):E122-4. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3285.
9
Intraoperative patient selection for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.无管经皮肾镜取石术的术中患者选择
Int Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;99(5):662-8. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00120.1.
10
Hemostatic plug: novel technique for closure of percutaneous nephrostomy tract.止血栓:经皮肾造瘘通道闭合的新技术。
J Endourol. 2015 Mar;29(3):263-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0264. Epub 2014 Oct 16.