Travis W D, Linnoila R I, Tsokos M G, Hitchcock C L, Cutler G B, Nieman L, Chrousos G, Pass H, Doppman J
Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1991 Jun;15(6):529-53. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199106000-00003.
Based on our review of 35 cases and the literature, we found the spectrum of pulmonary neuroendocrine (NE) tumors to be too broad to fit into the traditional three-category classification scheme of typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). We found that a spectrum of high- and low-grade tumors exist between TC and SCLC and that in the past many of these tumors have been called AC. We chose to adhere to Arrigoni's definition of AC, as his original criteria characterized a low-grade tumor. For the higher grade non-small-cell tumors (NSCLC), we propose a fourth category of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), which is characterized by: (a) light microscopic NE appearance; (b) cells of large size, polygonal shape, low nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio (N:C), coarse nuclear chromatin, and frequent nucleoli; (c) high mitotic rate [greater than 10/10 high-power fields (HPF)] and frequent necrosis; and (d) NE features by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or electron microscopy (EM). Thus, after deciding that a pulmonary NE tumor is high grade, the major diagnostic issue is separation of LCNEC from SCLC. This distinction is based not only on cell size, but on a variety of morphologic features. We studied 20 TC, six AC, five LCNEC, and four SCLC and characterized the clinical, light microscopic, EM, IHC, and flow cytometric features of each type of tumor. We did not find any advantage to IHC, EM, or flow cytometry over light microscopy in the subclassification or prediction of prognosis; however, these methods were useful in characterizing these four types of pulmonary NE tumors and in demonstrating their NE properties. LCNEC must be distinguished from a fifth category pulmonary NE tumor: NSCLC with NE features in which NE differentiation is not evident by light microscopy and must be demonstrated by EM or IHC. Although the prognosis of LCNEC appears to be intermediate between AC and SCLC, larger numbers of patients will be needed to demonstrate significant differences in survival.
基于我们对35例病例及相关文献的回顾,我们发现肺神经内分泌(NE)肿瘤的谱系过于宽泛,无法纳入典型类癌(TC)、非典型类癌(AC)和小细胞肺癌(SCLC)这一传统的三类分类方案。我们发现,在TC和SCLC之间存在一系列高分级和低分级肿瘤,并且过去许多这类肿瘤都被称为AC。我们选择遵循阿里戈尼对AC的定义,因为他最初的标准描述的是一种低分级肿瘤。对于高分级非小细胞肿瘤(NSCLC),我们提出第四类大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC),其特征为:(a)光镜下呈NE表现;(b)细胞体积大、呈多边形、核质比低(N:C)、核染色质粗糙且核仁常见;(c)有丝分裂率高[大于10/10高倍视野(HPF)]且常有坏死;(d)免疫组织化学(IHC)或电子显微镜(EM)显示有NE特征。因此,在确定肺NE肿瘤为高分级后,主要的诊断问题是将LCNEC与SCLC区分开来。这种区分不仅基于细胞大小,还基于多种形态学特征。我们研究了20例TC、6例AC、5例LCNEC和4例SCLC,并对每种肿瘤的临床、光镜、EM、IHC和流式细胞术特征进行了描述。我们发现在亚分类或预后预测方面,IHC、EM或流式细胞术相对于光镜并无优势;然而,这些方法在描述这四种肺NE肿瘤类型及其NE特性方面很有用。LCNEC必须与第五类肺NE肿瘤相区分:具有NE特征的NSCLC,其NE分化在光镜下不明显,必须通过EM或IHC来证实。尽管LCNEC的预后似乎介于AC和SCLC之间,但需要更多患者来证明生存方面的显著差异。