• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运输行业工人的吸烟行为。

Smoking behavior in trucking industry workers.

作者信息

Jain Nitin B, Hart Jaime E, Smith Thomas J, Garshick Eric, Laden Francine

机构信息

Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2006 Dec;49(12):1013-20. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20399.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.20399
PMID:17096359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1945044/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In retrospective occupational studies, the degree of confounding by smoking depends on variation in smoking among job-related exposure groups. We assessed the relationship between job title and smoking behavior as part of a study on occupational exposures and lung cancer.

METHODS

A questionnaire on smoking was mailed to a sample of 11,986 trucking industry workers. Company records were used to gather other relevant information.

RESULTS

The response rate was 40.5%. Among white males, the age-adjusted prevalence of ever smoking was highest among longhaul truck drivers (67%) and lowest among clerks (44%). Smoking rates among workers with other job titles were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results will be used to adjust for the differences in smoking among job-related exposure groups when assessing the association between particulate matter exposure and lung cancer mortality. Our study also suggests that an assessment of methods to control for smoking should be considered in the design of retrospective occupational health studies.

摘要

背景

在回顾性职业研究中,吸烟造成的混杂程度取决于与工作相关的暴露组之间吸烟情况的差异。作为一项关于职业暴露与肺癌的研究的一部分,我们评估了职位与吸烟行为之间的关系。

方法

向11986名运输行业工人的样本邮寄了一份关于吸烟的调查问卷。利用公司记录收集其他相关信息。

结果

回复率为40.5%。在白人男性中,曾经吸烟的年龄调整患病率在长途卡车司机中最高(67%),在办事员中最低(44%)。其他职位的工人吸烟率相似。

结论

在评估颗粒物暴露与肺癌死亡率之间的关联时,我们的结果将用于调整与工作相关的暴露组之间吸烟情况的差异。我们的研究还表明,在回顾性职业健康研究的设计中应考虑对控制吸烟方法的评估。

相似文献

1
Smoking behavior in trucking industry workers.运输行业工人的吸烟行为。
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Dec;49(12):1013-20. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20399.
2
Lung cancer and vehicle exhaust in trucking industry workers.运输行业工人中的肺癌与汽车尾气
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Oct;116(10):1327-32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11293. Epub 2008 May 30.
3
Occupation and cancer - follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries.职业与癌症 - 五个北欧国家的 1500 万人随访研究。
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):646-790. doi: 10.1080/02841860902913546.
4
Cause-specific mortality in the unionized U.S. trucking industry.美国工会化卡车运输行业的特定病因死亡率。
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Aug;115(8):1192-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10027.
5
Work related injuries in Washington State's Trucking Industry, by industry sector and occupation.华盛顿州运输业各行业及职业的工作相关伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Apr;65:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
6
Occupational magnetic field exposure, cardiovascular disease mortality, and potential confounding by smoking.职业磁场暴露、心血管疾病死亡率以及吸烟可能造成的混杂影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;15(8):622-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.12.013.
7
Lung cancer mortality in a Dutch cohort of asphalt workers: evaluation of possible confounding by smoking.荷兰一组沥青工人的肺癌死亡率:对吸烟可能造成的混杂因素的评估。
Am J Ind Med. 2003 Jan;43(1):79-87. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10141.
8
Effect of different approaches to treatment of smoking as a potential confounder in a case-control study on occupational exposures.在一项关于职业暴露的病例对照研究中,将吸烟作为潜在混杂因素时,不同治疗方法的效果。
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):101-4. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015941.
9
Assessment of perceived injury risks and priorities among truck drivers and trucking companies in Washington State.华盛顿州卡车司机和货运公司对感知到的伤害风险及优先级的评估。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(6):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
10
Occupations and Parkinson's disease: a multi-center case-control study in South Korea.职业与帕金森病:韩国的一项多中心病例对照研究。
Neurotoxicology. 2005 Jan;26(1):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.07.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-injury health status of truck drivers with a workers' compensation claim.工伤索赔卡车司机的受伤前健康状况。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):1683. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13885-4.
2
Factors influencing smoking behaviour of online ride-hailing drivers in China: a cross-sectional analysis.影响中国网约车司机吸烟行为的因素:一项横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11366-8.
3
Cardiometabolic risk factors and mental health status among truck drivers: a systematic review.卡车司机的心血管代谢危险因素与心理健康状况:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 23;10(10):e038993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038993.
4
Truck Drivers' Cigarette Smoking and Preferred Smoking Cessation Methods.卡车司机的吸烟情况及首选戒烟方法
Subst Abuse. 2020 Aug 13;14:1178221820949262. doi: 10.1177/1178221820949262. eCollection 2020.
5
To what extent do education and physical work load factors explain occupational differences in disability retirement due to knee OA? A nationwide register-based study in Finland.教育和体力工作负荷因素在多大程度上解释了膝关节骨关节炎导致残疾退休的职业差异?芬兰一项全国范围内基于登记的研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;8(11):e023057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023057.
6
Health Risks of American Long-Distance Truckers: Results From a Multisite Assessment.美国长途卡车司机的健康风险:多地点评估的结果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jul;60(7):e349-e355. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001319.
7
Comparison of risk factors for tooth loss between professional drivers and white-collar workers: an internet survey.职业司机与白领之间牙齿脱落危险因素的比较:一项网络调查。
Ind Health. 2016 Jun 10;54(3):246-53. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2015-0207. Epub 2015 Dec 26.
8
Associations of psychological capital, demographic and occupational factors with cigarette smoking among Chinese underground coal miners.中国地下煤矿工人心理资本、人口统计学和职业因素与吸烟的关联
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 21;15:20. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1349-6.
9
Obesity and other risk factors: the national survey of U.S. long-haul truck driver health and injury.肥胖及其他风险因素:美国长途卡车司机健康与伤害全国调查。
Am J Ind Med. 2014 Jun;57(6):615-26. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22293. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
10
A cross-sectional study of secondhand smoke exposure and respiratory symptoms in non-current smokers in the U.S. trucking industry: SHS exposure and respiratory symptoms.美国卡车运输业非吸烟人群二手烟暴露与呼吸道症状的横断面研究:二手烟暴露与呼吸道症状。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 1;13:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-93.

本文引用的文献

1
Cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 2003.2003年美国成年人吸烟情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 May 27;54(20):509-13.
2
Trends in US smoking rates in occupational groups: the National Health Interview Survey 1987-1994.美国职业群体吸烟率趋势:1987 - 1994年国家健康访谈调查
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jun;46(6):538-48. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000128152.01896.ae.
3
Cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 2002.2002年美国成年人吸烟情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 May 28;53(20):427-31.
4
State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 2002.2002年美国成年人当前吸烟情况的各州患病率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Jan 9;52(53):1277-80.
5
Cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 2001.2001年美国成年人吸烟情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003 Oct 10;52(40):953-6.
6
Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review.无烟工作场所对吸烟行为的影响:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188.
7
Prevalence of cigarette smoking by occupation and industry in the United States.美国按职业和行业划分的吸烟率。
Am J Ind Med. 2001 Sep;40(3):233-9. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1094.
8
State-specific trends in smoke-free workplace policy coverage: the current population survey tobacco use supplement, 1993 to 1999.无烟工作场所政策覆盖的州特定趋势:1993年至1999年当前人口调查烟草使用补充调查
J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Aug;43(8):680-6. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200108000-00005.
9
State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults and the proportion of adults who work in a smoke-free environment--United States, 1999.1999年美国成年人当前吸烟的州特定流行率以及在无烟环境中工作的成年人比例
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000 Nov 3;49(43):978-82.
10
Sex differences in workplace smoking policies: results from the current population survey.职场吸烟政策中的性别差异:当前人口调查结果
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2000 Fall;55(5):311-5.