• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸡生蛋还是蛋生鸡?英国非正式护理人员劳动力市场参与中的内生性问题。

The chicken or the egg? Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England.

作者信息

Heitmueller Axel

机构信息

Centre for New and Emerging Markets, London Business School, Regent's Park, London NW1 4SA, UK.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):536-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.005
PMID:17098311
Abstract

Around 14% of the UK labour force has informal care responsibilities and almost everyone in society will be an informal carer in their lifetime. A well-known fact in the small economic literature on informal care is the apparent negative relation between care responsibilities and labour market participation. Yet, caring and labour market participation may be endogenous. Using an instrumental variable approach and panel data techniques and employing data from the British Household Panel Study from 1991 to 2002, this paper shows that not accommodating for endogeneity in the labour market participation equation may significantly overestimate the impact care exhibits on the employment decision of informal carers. Moreover, it is shown that a negative impact on employment only applies to some care-types. Policy implications are derived.

摘要

英国约14%的劳动力承担着非正式护理责任,社会上几乎每个人在其一生中都会成为非正式护理者。在关于非正式护理的少量经济文献中,一个广为人知的事实是护理责任与劳动力市场参与之间明显存在负相关关系。然而,护理与劳动力市场参与可能是内生的。本文使用工具变量法和面板数据技术,并采用1991年至2002年英国家庭面板调查的数据,表明在劳动力市场参与方程中不考虑内生性可能会显著高估护理对非正式护理者就业决策的影响。此外,研究表明,对就业的负面影响仅适用于某些护理类型。文中还得出了政策含义。

相似文献

1
The chicken or the egg? Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England.鸡生蛋还是蛋生鸡?英国非正式护理人员劳动力市场参与中的内生性问题。
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):536-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
2
The effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: results from a multinomial endogenous treatment model.无报酬护理强度对劳动力参与的影响:来自多项内生处理模型的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;100:115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
3
Home-based palliative care in Sydney, Australia: the carer's perspective on the provision of informal care.澳大利亚悉尼的居家姑息治疗:照顾者对提供非正式护理的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Mar;15(2):97-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00665.x.
4
Health status and labour force participation: evidence from Australia.健康状况与劳动力参与:来自澳大利亚的证据。
Health Econ. 2006 Mar;15(3):241-61. doi: 10.1002/hec.1053.
5
Supporting working carers: do policies in England and The Netherlands reflect 'doulia rights'?支持在职护理人员:英格兰和荷兰的政策是否体现了“护理权利”?
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Dec;16(6):649-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00791.x. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
6
Chronic diseases and labour force participation in Australia.澳大利亚的慢性病与劳动力参与情况
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):91-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
7
Transitions into informal caregiving and out of paid employment of women in their 50s.50多岁女性向非正式照料角色的转变以及退出有偿工作的情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jul;67(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.031.
8
The emotional costs of caring incurred by men and women in the British labour market.英国劳动力市场中男性和女性在护理方面产生的情感成本。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(10):2160-71. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.027. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
9
Do they care too much to work? The influence of caregiving intensity on the labour force participation of unpaid caregivers in Canada.他们是否过于关心工作而无法工作?照顾强度对加拿大无偿照顾者劳动力参与的影响。
J Health Econ. 2010 Dec;29(6):895-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
10
The labour market costs of community care.社区护理的劳动力市场成本。
J Health Econ. 1998 Dec;17(6):747-65. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00036-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of providing intensive care and practical help in mid-life on employment transitions in Europe.在欧洲,中年时期提供重症护理和实际帮助对就业转型的影响。
Eur J Ageing. 2025 May 11;22(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00857-x.
2
Employment Responses to a Partner's Disability Onset ("Care Shocks"): Do Working Conditions Matter?对伴侣残疾发病(“照料冲击”)的就业反应:工作条件重要吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Mar 12;80(4). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae208.
3
Co-resident grandparent and maternal employment. A Northern Ireland cross-sectional administrative data analysis.
同住的祖父母与母亲的就业情况。一项北爱尔兰横断面行政数据分析。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Oct 9;9(1):2143. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2143. eCollection 2024.
4
Willingness to Care-Financial Incentives and Caregiving Decisions.护理意愿——经济激励与护理决策
Health Econ. 2025 Mar;34(3):442-455. doi: 10.1002/hec.4918. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
5
Long-term care insurance in China: Current challenges and recommendations.中国的长期护理保险:当前挑战与建议
J Glob Health. 2024 Sep 27;14:03015. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.03015.
6
[Reconciling Employment and Informal Caregiving for an Elderly Person at Home: Factors Influencing a Reduction in Employment due to Caregiving and Work-Related Wishes of Informal Caregivers].[协调在家照顾老人时的就业与非正式照料:影响因照料导致就业减少的因素及非正式照料者与工作相关的愿望]
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Feb;86(S 01):S45-S53. doi: 10.1055/a-2191-2074. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
7
Impacts of family care for children and the elderly on women's employment: evidence from rural China.家庭照料儿童和老人对女性就业的影响:来自中国农村的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 15;14:1208749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208749. eCollection 2023.
8
Unpaid caregiving and stress among older working-age men and women in Sweden.瑞典劳动年龄较大的男性和女性的无偿照护与压力
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jun 22;23:101458. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101458. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Longitudinal association between informal unpaid caregiving and mental health amongst working age adults in high-income OECD countries: A systematic review.经合组织高收入国家工作年龄成年人中非正式无偿照料与心理健康之间的纵向关联:一项系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 1;53:101711. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101711. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Why do men extend their employment beyond pensionable age more often than women? a cohort study.为什么男性比女性更常超龄就业?一项队列研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Dec 5;19(3):599-608. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00663-1. eCollection 2022 Sep.