• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经合组织高收入国家工作年龄成年人中非正式无偿照料与心理健康之间的纵向关联:一项系统综述

Longitudinal association between informal unpaid caregiving and mental health amongst working age adults in high-income OECD countries: A systematic review.

作者信息

Ervin Jennifer, Taouk Yamna, Fleitas Alfonzo Ludmila, Peasgood Tessa, King Tania

机构信息

Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 1;53:101711. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101711. eCollection 2022 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101711
PMID:36353526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9637877/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informal unpaid caregivers provide most of the world's care needs, experiencing numerous health and wealth penalties as a result. As the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted, informal care is highly gendered. Longitudinal evidence is needed to assess the causal effect of caregiving on mental health. This review addresses a gap by summarising and appraising the longitudinal evidence examining the association between unpaid caregiving and mental health among working age adults in high-income Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and examining gender differences.

METHODS

Six databases were searched (Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit) from Jan 1, 2000 to April 1, 2022. Population-based, peer-reviewed quantitative studies using any observational design were included. Population of interest was working age adults. Exposure was any unpaid caregiving, and studies must have had a non-caregiving comparator for inclusion. Mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, psychological distress/wellbeing) were measurable by validated self-report tools or professional diagnosis. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment (ROBINS-E) were conducted by two reviewers. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022312401).

FINDINGS

Of the 4536 records screened; 13 eligible studies (133,426 participants) were included. Overall quality of evidence was moderate. Significant between-study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, so albatross and effect-direction plots complement the narrative synthesis. Results indicate a negative association between informal unpaid care and mental health in adults of working age. Importantly, all included studies were longitudinal in design. Where studies were stratified by gender, caregiving had a consistently negative impact on the mental health of women. Few studies examined men but revealed a negative effect where an association was found.

INTERPRETATION

Our review highlights the need to mitigate the mental health risks of caregiving in working age adults. Whilst men need to be included in further scholarship, reducing the disproportionate caregiving load on women is a crucial requirement for policy development.

FUNDING

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Targeted Research Support Grant.

摘要

背景

非正式无薪照料者满足了世界上大部分的照料需求,因此承受着诸多健康和财富方面的不利影响。正如新冠疫情所凸显的,非正式照料存在高度的性别差异。需要纵向证据来评估照料对心理健康的因果效应。本综述通过总结和评估纵向证据来填补这一空白,这些证据考察了高收入经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家工作年龄成年人中无薪照料与心理健康之间的关联,并研究了性别差异。

方法

检索了六个数据库(Medline、PsycInfo、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、Econlit),时间跨度为2000年1月1日至2022年4月1日。纳入采用任何观察性设计的基于人群的、经同行评审的定量研究。研究对象为工作年龄成年人。暴露因素为任何无薪照料,且研究必须有非照料对照以纳入研究。心理健康结果(抑郁、焦虑、心理困扰/幸福感)可通过经过验证的自我报告工具或专业诊断进行测量。由两名评审员进行筛选、数据提取和质量评估(ROBINS-E)。该研究已在PROSPERO(CRD42022312401)上进行前瞻性注册。

结果

在筛选的4536条记录中,纳入了13项符合条件的研究(133,426名参与者)。证据的总体质量为中等。研究间存在显著异质性,无法进行荟萃分析,因此采用信天翁图和效应方向图来辅助叙述性综合分析。结果表明,工作年龄成年人的非正式无薪照料与心理健康之间存在负相关。重要的是,所有纳入研究均为纵向设计。在按性别分层的研究中,照料对女性心理健康始终有负面影响。很少有研究考察男性,但发现存在关联时显示有负面影响。

解读

我们的综述强调了减轻工作年龄成年人照料带来的心理健康风险的必要性。虽然需要在进一步的学术研究中纳入男性,但减少女性不成比例过重的照料负担是政策制定的关键要求。

资金来源

墨尔本人口与全球健康学院,定向研究支持基金。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebab/9637877/ceeefe503317/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebab/9637877/c0bb946e5711/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebab/9637877/ceeefe503317/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebab/9637877/c0bb946e5711/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebab/9637877/ceeefe503317/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Longitudinal association between informal unpaid caregiving and mental health amongst working age adults in high-income OECD countries: A systematic review.经合组织高收入国家工作年龄成年人中非正式无偿照料与心理健康之间的纵向关联:一项系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 1;53:101711. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101711. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Unpaid caregiving and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic-A systematic review of the quantitative literature.《COVID-19 大流行期间的无偿护理和心理健康:定量文献的系统评价》
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0297097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297097. eCollection 2024.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Web-Based Interventions to Improve Mental Health, General Caregiving Outcomes, and General Health for Informal Caregivers of Adults With Chronic Conditions Living in the Community: Rapid Evidence Review.基于网络的干预措施对社区中患有慢性病的成年人的非正式照料者心理健康、一般照料结果和总体健康的改善:快速证据综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 28;19(7):e263. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7564.
5
Assessing the impact of caregiving on informal caregivers of adults with a mental disorder in OECD countries: A systematic literature review of concepts and their respective questionnaires.评估经合组织国家成年精神障碍患者非正式照护者所受影响:概念及其各自问卷的系统文献综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270278. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
7
The association between unpaid labour and mental health in working-age adults in Australia from 2002 to 2020: a longitudinal population-based cohort study.2002年至2020年澳大利亚工作年龄成年人中无薪劳动与心理健康的关联:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Apr;8(4):e276-e285. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00030-0.
8
Effectiveness of interventions to address the negative health outcomes of informal caregiving to older adults: protocol for an umbrella review.干预措施对解决老年人非正式照护负面健康结果的有效性:伞式综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e053117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053117.
9
Impact of Internet-Based Interventions on Caregiver Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于互联网的干预措施对照顾者心理健康的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 3;20(7):e10668. doi: 10.2196/10668.
10
The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.长时间工作暴露对中风的影响:来自世卫组织/国际劳工组织工作相关疾病和伤害负担联合估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2020 Sep;142:105746. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105746. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring caregiver perspectives on health service delivery priorities for individuals with complex care needs: a qualitative descriptive study.探索护理人员对有复杂护理需求者的医疗服务提供优先事项的看法:一项质性描述性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1059. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13249-9.
2
Links between intuitive and mindful eating and mood: do food intake and exercise mediate this association?直觉性饮食和正念饮食与情绪之间的联系:食物摄入和运动是否介导了这种关联?
Front Nutr. 2025 May 30;12:1458082. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1458082. eCollection 2025.
3
Does the Informal Carer Identification Method Matter? Evidence from Self-Declaration and Time Diary Approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Time for Physical Activity: Different, Unequal, Gendered.体育活动时间:差异、不平等与性别化
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Mar;63(1):37-54. doi: 10.1177/00221465211028910.
2
Associations of combining paid work and family care with gender-specific differences in depressive symptoms among older workers and the role of work characteristics.老年劳动者的有偿工作和家庭照料相结合与抑郁症状的性别差异之间的关联,以及工作特征的作用。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Apr 1;48(3):190-199. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4014. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
3
Dravet syndrome: Effects on informal caregivers' mental health and quality of life - A systematic review.
非正式照料者识别方法重要吗?来自自我申报法和时间日志法的证据。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01506-y.
4
The interplay between home and job demands, resources, and the intention to stay in nursing: A cross-sectional study.家庭与工作需求、资源以及留在护理行业的意愿之间的相互作用:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Mar 17;8:100318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100318. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Dutch translation and validation of the Stanford Gender-Related Variables for Health Research questionnaire: Associations with lifestyle and mental health.斯坦福健康研究性别相关变量问卷的荷兰语翻译与验证:与生活方式和心理健康的关联
J Health Psychol. 2025 Jun;30(7):1563-1576. doi: 10.1177/13591053241306874. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
6
Mental and Physical Wellbeing of Carer-Employees in Canada.加拿大护理员工的身心健康
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 30;21(12):1611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121611.
7
Caregiving in Asia: Priority areas for research, policy, and practice to support family caregivers.亚洲的照护工作:支持家庭照护者的研究、政策及实践重点领域
Health Care Sci. 2024 Dec 18;3(6):374-382. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.124. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Psychological Well-being Interactively Affected by Long Working Hours and Caregiving Activities.心理幸福感受到长时间工作和照料活动的交互影响。
Saf Health Work. 2024 Dec;15(4):458-463. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
9
The roles of employment status and income in the mental health of informal caregivers in Germany.就业状况和收入在德国非正规照护者心理健康中的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2802. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20252-y.
10
The prevalence, characteristics, and psychological wellbeing of unpaid carers in the United Kingdom.英国无偿护理者的患病率、特征及心理健康状况
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;60(4):869-879. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02745-8. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
德拉韦特综合征:对非正规照护者心理健康和生活质量的影响——系统评价。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Sep;122:108206. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108206. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
4
Informal care and the impact on depression and anxiety among Swedish adults: a population-based cohort study.非正式照料及其对瑞典成年人抑郁和焦虑的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):1263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11246-1.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods.效果方向图再探:2019 年 Cochrane 手册关于替代综合方法的指导应用。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):29-33. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1458. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Health outcomes of unpaid caregivers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中低收入国家无偿照顾者的健康结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):3950-3965. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15450. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
The invisible workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: Family carers at the frontline.新冠疫情期间的隐形劳动力:身处前线的家庭照料者。
HRB Open Res. 2020 May 15;3:24. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13059.1. eCollection 2020.
9
General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-6), and Mental Health Index (MHI-5): psychometric and predictive properties in a Finnish population-based sample.一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI-6)和心理健康指数(MHI-5):芬兰人群样本中的心理计量学和预测性能。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:112973. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112973. Epub 2020 May 7.
10
Burden and Gender inequalities around Informal Care.非正规照料中的负担与性别不平等
Invest Educ Enferm. 2020 Feb;38(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v38n1e10.