De Dreu Carsten K W
University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):628-38. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.628.
A motivated information processing perspective (C. K. W. De Dreu & P. J. D. Carnevale, 2003; see also V. B. Hinsz, R. S. Tindale, & D. A. Vollrath, 1997) was used to predict that perceived cooperative outcome interdependence interacts with team-level reflexivity to predict information sharing, learning, and team effectiveness. A cross-sectional field study involving management and cross-functional teams (N = 46) performing nonroutine, complex tasks corroborated predictions: The more team members perceived cooperative outcome interdependence, the better they shared information, the more they learned and the more effective they were, especially when task reflexivity was high. When task reflexivity was low, no significant relationship was found between cooperative outcome interdependence and team processes and performance. The author concludes that the motivated information processing perspective is valid outside the confines of the laboratory and can be extended toward teamwork in organizations.
从动机性信息加工的角度（C. K. W. 德德鲁和P. J. D. 卡内瓦莱，2003年；另见V. B. 欣茨、R. S. 廷代尔和D. A. 沃尔拉特，1997年）进行分析预测，即感知到的合作结果相互依赖与团队层面的反思性相互作用，进而预测信息共享、学习和团队效能。一项涉及管理团队和跨职能团队（N = 46）执行非例行复杂任务的横断面实地研究证实了上述预测：团队成员越能感知到合作结果相互依赖，他们的信息共享就越好，学习就越多，效能也就越高，尤其是在任务反思性较高时。当任务反思性较低时，合作结果相互依赖与团队流程和绩效之间未发现显著关系。作者得出结论，动机性信息加工的观点在实验室范围之外也是有效的，并且可以扩展到组织中的团队合作。
