de Jonge Jan, Dormann Christian
Subdepartment of Human Performance Management, Department of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1359-74. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1359.
Two longitudinal studies investigated the issue of match between job stressors and job resources in the prediction of job-related strain. On the basis of the triple-match principle (TMP), it was hypothesized that resources are most likely to moderate the relation between stressors and strains if resources, stressors, and strains all match. Resources are less likely to moderate the relation between stressors and strains if (a) only resources and stressors match, (b) only resources and strains match, or (c) only stressors and strains match. Resources are least likely to moderate the relation between stressors and strains if there is no match among stressors, resources, and strains. The TMP was tested among 280 and 267 health care workers in 2 longitudinal surveys. The likelihood of finding moderating effects was linearly related to the degree of match, with 33.3% of all tested interactions becoming significant when there was a triple match, 16.7% when there was a double match, and 0.0% when there was no match. Findings were most consistent if there was an emotional match or a physical match.
两项纵向研究调查了工作压力源与工作资源的匹配问题对工作相关压力的预测作用。基于三重匹配原则（TMP），研究假设，如果资源、压力源和压力均相互匹配，那么资源最有可能缓和压力源与压力之间的关系。如果（a）仅资源与压力源匹配，（b）仅资源与压力匹配，或（c）仅压力源与压力匹配，那么资源缓和压力源与压力之间关系的可能性较小。如果压力源、资源和压力之间不存在匹配关系，那么资源缓和压力源与压力之间关系的可能性最小。在两项纵向调查中，对280名和267名医护人员进行了TMP测试。发现调节作用的可能性与匹配程度呈线性相关，当三者均匹配时，所有测试交互作用中有33.3%显著，当两者匹配时为16.7%，当无匹配关系时为0.0%。如果存在情感匹配或身体匹配，研究结果最为一致。
