Namasivayam S, Kalra M K, Pottala K M, Waldrop S M, Hudgins P A
Department of Radiology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(10):2221-5.
Z-axis automatic exposure control (AEC) technique automatically adjusts tube current based on size of body region scanned. The purpose of the current study was to compare diagnostic acceptability, noise, and radiation exposure of multidetector row CT (MDCT) of neck performed with z-axis AEC and with fixed current.
Two study groups of 26 patients each underwent MDCT of neck using z-axis AEC with 8 noise index (NI), 150-440 mA, and 10 NI, 75-440 mA, respectively. A control group consisting of another 26 patients underwent MDCT of neck with fixed-current technique (300 mA). Objective noise and mean tube current-time products (mA . s) were recorded. Two radiologists evaluated images for diagnostic acceptability and subjective noise on a 5-point scale.
All CT examinations of study and control groups were diagnostically acceptable, though objective noise was significantly more with z-axis AEC (shoulder: NI 8, 20.6 +/- 6.2 HU; NI 10, 22.2 +/- 4.6 HU) than with fixed current (16.2 +/- 6 HU) (P = .01). There was no significant difference between AEC and fixed current in diagnostic acceptability and subjective noise (P = .22-.42). AEC resulted in significant radiation dose reduction (NI 8, 186.3 +/- 20.5 mA . s; NI 10, 158.1 +/- 21.2 mA x s), compared with fixed current (235 +/- 21.8 mA x s).
Z-axis AEC resulted in similar subjective noise and diagnostic acceptability, with radiation dose reduction of 21% for NI of 8 and 33% for NI of 10, respectively, for MDCT evaluation of neck, compared with those of fixed current technique.
Z轴自动曝光控制(AEC)技术可根据扫描的身体区域大小自动调整管电流。本研究的目的是比较采用Z轴AEC和固定电流进行颈部多排螺旋CT(MDCT)检查时的诊断可接受性、噪声及辐射剂量。
两个研究组各26例患者分别接受颈部MDCT检查,一组采用Z轴AEC,噪声指数(NI)为8,管电流150 - 440 mA;另一组NI为10,管电流75 - 440 mA。对照组26例患者采用固定电流技术(300 mA)进行颈部MDCT检查。记录客观噪声及平均管电流 - 时间积(毫安·秒)。两名放射科医生采用5分制对图像的诊断可接受性和主观噪声进行评估。
研究组和对照组的所有CT检查在诊断上均可接受,不过Z轴AEC的客观噪声(肩部:NI 8时,20.6±6.2 HU;NI 10时,22.2±4.6 HU)显著高于固定电流(16.2±6 HU)(P = 0.01)。AEC与固定电流在诊断可接受性和主观噪声方面无显著差异(P = 0.22 - 0.42)。与固定电流(235±21.8毫安·秒)相比,AEC显著降低了辐射剂量(NI 8时,186.3±20.5毫安·秒;NI 10时,158.1±21.2毫安·秒)。
与固定电流技术相比,Z轴AEC在颈部MDCT评估中主观噪声和诊断可接受性相似,NI为8时辐射剂量降低21%,NI为10时辐射剂量降低33%。