Johnson C Anderson, Xie Bin, Liu Chunhong, Reynolds Kim D, Chou Chih-Ping, Koprowski Carol, Gallaher Peggy, Spruitj-Metz Donna, Guo Qian, Sun Ping, Gong Jie, Palmer Paula
Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Alhambra, California, USA.
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Dec;39(6):925.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
This study performed parallel analyses on two large samples of seventh graders living in Los Angeles, California and in Wuhan, China to make direct comparisons of overweight and obesity risks in Western and Eastern cultural environments.
Two representative samples of 1772 and 1896 seventh grade students were randomly selected from the public or parochial middle schools in the greater Los Angeles area of Southern California in the United States, and public schools in Wuhan city of China. Two body mass index (BMI) references recently established by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) and the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF), respectively, were used to define overweight (85th < or = BMI < 95th percentile) and obesity (BMI > or = 95th percentile). Logistic regressions were conducted to examine relationships between socioeconomic status (SES) and obesity risk.
The prevalence rates of combined overweight and obesity in Los Angeles and in Wuhan were 43.1% and 12.1%, respectively, by the US-NCHS reference, and 45.8% and 11.9%, respectively, by the IOTF reference. Chinese-American adolescents had higher prevalence rates for overweight and obesity than those from China. SES was positively related to the risk of overweight and obesity in the Chinese sample, whereas a negative association was found in Southern California adolescents. Urbanicity was significantly positively related to higher overweight and obesity prevalence.
Different overweight and obesity prevalence estimates and SES effects were observed for American and Chinese adolescent samples. Research on the underlying mechanisms is needed to help us to set up a tailored program for obesity prevention in Eastern and Western cultural environments.
本研究对居住在美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市和中国武汉市的两组七年级学生大样本进行了平行分析,以直接比较西方和东方文化环境中超重和肥胖风险。
分别从美国南加州大洛杉矶地区的公立或教会中学以及中国武汉市的公立学校中随机抽取了1772名和1896名七年级学生作为两个代表性样本。分别采用美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)和国际肥胖特别工作组(IOTF)最近建立的两个体重指数(BMI)参考标准来定义超重(第85百分位数≤BMI<第95百分位数)和肥胖(BMI≥第95百分位数)。进行逻辑回归分析以检验社会经济地位(SES)与肥胖风险之间的关系。
按照美国国家卫生统计中心的参考标准,洛杉矶和武汉超重与肥胖合并患病率分别为43.1%和12.1%;按照国际肥胖特别工作组的参考标准,分别为45.8%和11.9%。华裔美国青少年超重和肥胖的患病率高于来自中国的青少年。在中国样本中,SES与超重和肥胖风险呈正相关,而在南加州青少年中则发现呈负相关。城市化与较高的超重和肥胖患病率显著正相关。
观察到美国和中国青少年样本在超重和肥胖患病率估计以及SES影响方面存在差异。需要对潜在机制进行研究,以帮助我们制定适合东西方文化环境的肥胖预防定制方案。