• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西人群中心性肥胖的标准:对代谢综合征的影响。

Criteria for central obesity in a Brazilian population: impact on metabolic syndrome.

作者信息

Barbosa Paulo José Bastos, Lessa Ines, de Almeida Filho Naomar, Magalhães Lucélia Batista N Cunha, Araújo Jenny

机构信息

Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006 Oct;87(4):407-14. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2006001700003.

DOI:10.1590/s0066-782x2006001700003
PMID:17128308
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify and propose the optimal waist circumference cut-off points (WCp) for the diagnosis of central obesity (CO) in a Brazilian population, so as to compare these cut-off points with those recommended by the ATPIII (WC-ATPIII), and to estimate the difference in prevalence rates of metabolic syndrome (MS) using the two criteria.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted in a population subgroup of 1439 adults in the city of Salvador, Brazil. ROC curves of waist circumference (WC) were plotted to identify diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity. ROC curve sensitivity and specificity values >60% and the closest to each other were used to define WCp. The prevalence of MS was estimated using WCp and WC-ATPIII.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and twenty nine women comprised 57.7% of the sample. The WCp selected were 84 cm for women and 88 cm for men. These cut-off points detected DM with a 68.7% and 70% sensitivity, and a 66.2% and 68.3% specificity, respectively. For obesity, sensitivity and specificity were 79.8% and 77.6% in women and 64.3% and 71.6% in men, respectively. Using WC-ATPIII, 88 cm (for women) and 102 cm (for men), the sensitivity was 53.3% and 26.5%, respectively, to diagnose DM. For obesity, sensitivity was 66.5% (for women) and 28.6% (for men). The prevalence of MS using WCp was 23.7%, 95%CI (21.6-25.9), whereas using WC-ATPIII it was 19.0%, 95%CI (17.1-20.9), 1.2 times higher using WCp.

CONCLUSION

WC-ATPIII were inappropriate and underestimated the prevalence of MS in the population studied, particularly among men. We suggest that the WC cut-off points > 84 cm for women and > 88 cm for men should be tested in other Brazilian populations.

摘要

目的

确定并提出巴西人群中用于诊断中心性肥胖(CO)的最佳腰围切点(WCp),以便将这些切点与ATPIII推荐的切点(WC - ATPIII)进行比较,并使用这两种标准估计代谢综合征(MS)患病率的差异。

方法

对巴西萨尔瓦多市1439名成年人的人群亚组进行横断面研究。绘制腰围(WC)的ROC曲线以识别糖尿病(DM)和肥胖症。使用ROC曲线敏感度和特异度值>60%且彼此最接近的情况来定义WCp。使用WCp和WC - ATPIII估计MS的患病率。

结果

829名女性占样本的57.7%。选定的WCp女性为84厘米,男性为88厘米。这些切点检测DM的敏感度分别为68.7%和70%,特异度分别为66.2%和68.3%。对于肥胖症,女性的敏感度和特异度分别为79.8%和77.6%,男性分别为64.3%和71.6%。使用WC - ATPIII(女性88厘米,男性102厘米)诊断DM的敏感度分别为53.3%和26.5%。对于肥胖症,敏感度分别为66.5%(女性)和28.6%(男性)。使用WCp时MS的患病率为23.7%,95%CI(21.6 - 25.9),而使用WC - ATPIII时为19.0%,95%CI(17.1 - 20.9),使用WCp时高出1.2倍。

结论

WC - ATPIII不合适,低估了所研究人群中MS的患病率,尤其是在男性中。我们建议应在其他巴西人群中测试女性>84厘米、男性>88厘米的WC切点。

相似文献

1
Criteria for central obesity in a Brazilian population: impact on metabolic syndrome.巴西人群中心性肥胖的标准:对代谢综合征的影响。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006 Oct;87(4):407-14. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2006001700003.
2
Waist circumference cut-off points for identification of abdominal obesity among the tunisian adult population.突尼斯成年人群中用于识别腹部肥胖的腰围切点。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007 Nov;9(6):859-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00667.x.
3
References of anthropometric indices of central obesity and metabolic syndrome in Jordanian men and women.约旦男性和女性中心性肥胖及代谢综合征人体测量指标的参考文献。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2012 Jan-Mar;6(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
4
The Optimal Ethnic-Specific Waist-Circumference Cut-Off Points of Metabolic Syndrome among Low-Income Rural Uyghur Adults in Far Western China and Implications in Preventive Public Health.中国西部偏远地区低收入农村维吾尔族成年人代谢综合征的最佳种族特异性腰围切点及其对预防性公共卫生的意义
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 8;14(2):158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020158.
5
Central obesity and metabolic risk factors in middle-aged Chinese.中年中国人的中心型肥胖与代谢危险因素。
Biomed Environ Sci. 2014 May;27(5):343-52. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.059.
6
The lipid accumulation product is a powerful tool to predict metabolic syndrome in undiagnosed Brazilian adults.脂联素与代谢综合征及其组分在巴西未诊断人群中的相关性
Clin Nutr. 2017 Dec;36(6):1693-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
7
Optimal waist circumference cut-off points and ability of different metabolic syndrome criteria for predicting diabetes in Japanese men and women: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study.日本男性和女性中预测糖尿病的最佳腰围切点及不同代谢综合征标准的预测能力:日本职业健康研究流行病学协作组
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 3;16:220. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2856-9.
8
Anthropometric indices of central obesity how discriminators of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian women with polycystic ovary syndrome.中心性肥胖的人体测量学指标如何区分巴西多囊卵巢综合征女性的代谢综合征。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012 Jan;28(1):12-5. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2011.583956. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
9
Sensitivity and specificity of waist circumference as a single screening tool for identification of overweight and obesity among Malaysian adults.腰围作为马来西亚成年人超重和肥胖单一筛查工具的敏感性和特异性。
Med J Malaysia. 2011 Dec;66(5):462-7.
10
The six obesity indices, which one is more compatible with metabolic syndrome? A population based study.六种肥胖指数,哪一种与代谢综合征更相符?一项基于人群的研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.08.024. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in nursing professionals: An accuracy study.护理专业人员代谢综合征的诊断:一项准确性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0295985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295985. eCollection 2024.
2
Correlation and agreement between the body mass index and abdominal perimeter with the waist-to-height ratio in peruvian adults aged 18 to 59 years.秘鲁 18 至 59 岁成年人的体质指数和腹围与身高比的相关性和一致性。
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2022 Oct-Dec;39(4):392-399. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2022.394.11932. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers.
轮班工作者心血管代谢风险筛查的体脂指标
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020 Dec 11;18(2):125-132. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2020-440.
4
CAN STATURE, ABDOMINAL PERIMETER AND BMI INDEX PREDICT POSSIBLE CARDIOMETABOLIC RISKS IN FUTURE OBESITY?身高、腹围和体重指数能否预测未来肥胖人群可能存在的心脏代谢风险?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2020 Nov 20;33(2):e1529. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020200002e1529. eCollection 2020.
5
Cut-off points of anthropometric markers associated with hypertension and diabetes in Peru: Demographic and Health Survey 2018.秘鲁与高血压和糖尿病相关的人体测量指标切点:2018年人口与健康调查
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct 16;24(4):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004036.
6
Defining Abdominal Obesity as a Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease in the U.S.: Results From the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).定义腹部肥胖为美国冠心病的一个危险因素:来自西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1774-1780. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1855. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
7
Cardiovascular Risk in Women Deprived of Freedom from a Public Prison in Mato Grosso, Brazil.巴西马托格罗索州一所公立监狱中被剥夺自由的女性的心血管风险。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Apr;27(2):139-150. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00365-2. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
8
Optimal cut-off points for waist circumference in the definition of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: baseline analyses of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).巴西成年人代谢综合征定义中腰围的最佳切点:成人健康纵向研究(ELSA-Brasil)的基线分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018 Jun 15;10:49. doi: 10.1186/s13098-018-0347-0. eCollection 2018.
9
Prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors among professional male long-distance bus drivers in Lagos, south-west Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.尼日利亚西南部拉各斯职业男性长途巴士司机中心血管代谢危险因素的患病率:一项横断面研究。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29(2):106-114. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-006. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
10
The relationship between carbohydrate quality and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome: challenges of glycemic index and glycemic load.碳水化合物质量与代谢综合征患病率之间的关系:血糖指数和血糖负荷的挑战。
Eur J Nutr. 2018 Apr;57(3):1197-1205. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1402-6. Epub 2017 Mar 1.