Piko Bettina F, Fitzpatrick Kevin M
University of Szeged, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Behavioral Science, Szeged, Hungary.
Eur J Public Health. 2007 Aug;17(4):353-60. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl257. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
While socioeconomic differences in health, morbidity, and disability are highest among middle-aged persons, there is a certain level of 'equalization' during adolescence and young adulthood. Despite this equalization, however, there still are differences in psychosocial variables or health-related behaviours, often very subtle and sometimes difficult to measure.
Using data (n = 1114) on high school students (aged between 14 and 21 years) from the Southern Plain Region, Hungary, the present study looks at the role of multiple SES indicators (objective and subjective; occupation and education; family structure) in adolescents' psychosocial health (self-perceived health, psychosomatic, and depressive symptomatology) and health behaviour (substance use and sports activity).
Based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analyses, findings suggest the following: (i) SES self-assessment proved to be a significant predictor of adolescents' psychosocial health and health behaviours; (ii) family structure (that is, living in a non-intact family) also significantly influenced adolescents' psychosocial health and health behaviours; (iii) parents' employment status and schooling had a limited influence on their children's health outcomes; (iv) in a word, SES gradients in adolescents' psychosocial health and health behaviour were inconsistent and sometimes irregular (that is, inverse). The subjective SES measurement plays an important role (positive association), whereas certain types of parents' inactive status (in terms of labour market, that is, unemployment or retirement) seem to act in a predictable way (negative association).
Our results indicate that despite certain level of equalization during adolescence, some important relationships between SES variables and health outcomes may occur.
虽然健康、发病率和残疾方面的社会经济差异在中年人中最为显著,但在青少年和青年时期存在一定程度的“均等化”。然而,尽管有这种均等化,心理社会变量或与健康相关的行为仍存在差异,这些差异往往非常细微,有时难以衡量。
本研究利用匈牙利南部平原地区高中生(年龄在14至21岁之间)的数据(n = 1114),探讨多种社会经济地位指标(客观和主观;职业和教育;家庭结构)在青少年心理社会健康(自我感知健康、身心症状和抑郁症状)和健康行为(物质使用和体育活动)中的作用。
基于多变量逻辑回归分析的结果,研究结果表明如下:(i)社会经济地位自我评估被证明是青少年心理社会健康和健康行为的重要预测指标;(ii)家庭结构(即生活在不完整家庭中)也显著影响青少年的心理社会健康和健康行为;(iii)父母的就业状况和受教育程度对其子女的健康结果影响有限;(iv)总之,青少年心理社会健康和健康行为中的社会经济地位梯度不一致,有时不规则(即相反)。主观社会经济地位测量起着重要作用(正相关),而某些类型的父母非就业状态(在劳动力市场方面,即失业或退休)似乎以可预测的方式起作用(负相关)。
我们的结果表明,尽管青少年时期存在一定程度的均等化,但社会经济地位变量与健康结果之间可能存在一些重要关系。