Dien Joseph, Khoe Wayne, Mangun George R
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Aug;28(8):742-63. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20304.
Independent components analysis (ICA) and principal components analysis (PCA) are methods used to analyze event-related potential (ERP) and functional imaging (fMRI) data. In the present study, ICA and PCA were directly compared by applying them to simulated ERP datasets. Specifically, PCA was used to generate a subspace of the dataset followed by the application of PCA Promax or ICA Infomax rotations. The simulated datasets were composed of real background EEG activity plus two ERP simulated components. The results suggest that Promax is most effective for temporal analysis, whereas Infomax is most effective for spatial analysis. Failed analyses were examined and used to devise potential diagnostic strategies for both rotations. Finally, the results also showed that decomposition of subject averages yield better results than of grand averages across subjects.
独立成分分析(ICA)和主成分分析(PCA)是用于分析事件相关电位(ERP)和功能成像(fMRI)数据的方法。在本研究中,通过将ICA和PCA应用于模拟的ERP数据集来直接比较它们。具体而言,PCA用于生成数据集的一个子空间,随后应用PCA斜交旋转或ICA最大信息旋转。模拟数据集由真实的背景脑电图活动加上两个模拟的ERP成分组成。结果表明,斜交旋转对时间分析最有效,而最大信息旋转对空间分析最有效。对失败的分析进行了检查,并用于为两种旋转设计潜在的诊断策略。最后,结果还表明,对个体平均值进行分解比跨个体的总体平均值分解能产生更好的结果。