• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬太尼离子导入透皮系统用于骨科手术后急性疼痛管理:与吗啡静脉自控镇痛的比较研究

Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system for acute-pain management after orthopedic surgery: a comparative study with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

作者信息

Hartrick Craig T, Bourne Michael H, Gargiulo Kathryn, Damaraju C V, Vallow Sue, Hewitt David J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.08.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.rapm.2006.08.011
PMID:17138198
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) has been demonstrated in clinical trials to be safe and effective for acute-pain management after several types of major surgery. The current study compared the efficacy, safety, and convenience of fentanyl ITS with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) for acute-pain management after unilateral total-hip replacement (THR).

METHODS

In this multicenter (52 sites), randomized, open-label, active-controlled, phase IIIb study, patients (n = 799) received fentanyl ITS (40 mug fentanyl [10-minute infusion/lockout], up to 6 doses/h) or morphine IV PCA (1-mg morphine bolus [5-minute lockout], up to 10 mg/h) after unilateral THR. The primary efficacy measure was success ratings ("excellent" or "good") on the patient global assessment (PGA) of the method of pain control in the first 24 hours. Pain intensity and adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

The PGA success ratings (83.0% v 82.2%; difference = 0.9%; 95% CI: -4.4% to 6.1%) and the mean last pain-intensity scores (3.0 v 3.0; difference = 0.0; 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.33) in the first 24 hours were statistically equivalent between fentanyl ITS and morphine IV PCA groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study demonstrate fentanyl ITS and a standard regimen of morphine IV PCA were comparable methods of pain control for management of acute postoperative pain after THR, on the basis of the PGA success ratings and pain intensity in the first 24 hours of treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

盐酸芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)在临床试验中已被证明对几种大手术后的急性疼痛管理是安全有效的。本研究比较了芬太尼ITS与吗啡静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)在单侧全髋关节置换术(THR)后急性疼痛管理中的疗效、安全性和便利性。

方法

在这项多中心(52个地点)、随机、开放标签、活性对照的IIIb期研究中,患者(n = 799)在单侧THR后接受芬太尼ITS(40μg芬太尼[10分钟输注/锁定],每小时最多6剂)或吗啡IV PCA(1mg吗啡推注[5分钟锁定],每小时最多10mg)。主要疗效指标是治疗后前24小时患者对疼痛控制方法的总体评估(PGA)中的成功评分(“优秀”或“良好”)。还评估了疼痛强度和不良事件。

结果

芬太尼ITS组和吗啡IV PCA组在治疗后前24小时的PGA成功评分(83.0%对82.2%;差异 = 0.9%;95%CI:-4.4%至6.1%)和最后平均疼痛强度评分(3.0对3.0;差异 = 0.0;95%CI:-0.33至0.33)在统计学上分别相当。两组间不良事件的发生率相似。

结论

本研究结果表明,基于治疗后前24小时的PGA成功评分和疼痛强度,芬太尼ITS和标准的吗啡IV PCA方案是THR后急性术后疼痛管理中可比的疼痛控制方法。

相似文献

1
Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system for acute-pain management after orthopedic surgery: a comparative study with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统用于骨科手术后急性疼痛管理:与吗啡静脉自控镇痛的比较研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.08.011.
2
Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)与静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)联合吗啡用于腹部或盆腔手术后疼痛管理的疗效和安全性。
Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(8):657-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00257.x.
3
Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups.芬太尼 HCl 离子电渗经皮贴剂与吗啡静脉患者自控镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的疗效和安全性:患者亚组比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):433-40. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283349d82.
4
Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management following gynecological surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于妇科手术后疼痛管理的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Pain Manag. 2015 Sep;5(5):339-48. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.29. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management following orthopedic surgery: A pooled analysis of randomized, controlled trials.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于骨科手术后疼痛管理的比较:随机对照试验的汇总分析
J Opioid Manag. 2016 Jan-Feb;12(1):37-45. doi: 10.5055/jom.2016.0310.
6
The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的安全性和有效性:三项随机、活性对照临床研究的汇总数据分析
Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1428-36, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281913.28623.fd.
7
Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial.患者自控经皮盐酸芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡泵用于术后镇痛的随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1333-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1333.
8
Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management.使用芬太尼的离子导入透皮系统与使用吗啡的患者自控静脉镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102.
9
Patients' assessment of the convenience of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) in the management of postoperative pain after major surgery.患者对盐酸芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)与吗啡静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)用于大手术后疼痛管理的便利性评估。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2009 Sep;10(3):124-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.09.001. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
10
Patient-Controlled Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System Improved Postoperative Mobility Compared to Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Morphine: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials.与静脉自控镇痛吗啡相比,患者自控芬太尼离子导入透皮系统改善了术后活动能力:一项随机对照试验的汇总分析。
Pain Pract. 2017 Feb;17(2):197-207. doi: 10.1111/papr.12432. Epub 2016 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统
Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jan;51(1):71-82. doi: 10.1310/hpj5101-71. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
2
Exploiting Injury-Induced Peripheral Opioid Receptor Changes in Novel Analgesic Development for Chronic Pain.在慢性疼痛新型镇痛药物研发中利用损伤诱导的外周阿片受体变化
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 26;3:883164. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.883164. eCollection 2022.
3
[Perioperative pain management of total hip arthroplasty].[全髋关节置换术的围手术期疼痛管理]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 15;33(9):1190-1195. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903026.
4
Analysis of Multiple Routes of Analgesic Administration in the Immediate Postoperative Period: a 10-Year Experience.术后即刻镇痛途径的多模式分析:10 年经验。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 11;23(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0754-4.
5
[Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].[跨学科立场文件《围手术期疼痛管理》]
Schmerz. 2017 Oct;31(5):463-482. doi: 10.1007/s00482-017-0217-y.
6
High Body Mass Index and Use of Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System in Postoperative Pain Management: Results of a Pooled Analysis of Six Phase 3/3B Trials.高体重指数与芬太尼离子导入透皮系统在术后疼痛管理中的应用:六项3期/3B期试验的汇总分析结果
Pain Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):29-43. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0064-z. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Comparison of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and routine care with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the management of early postoperative mobilisation: results from a randomised study.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与常规护理联合吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于术后早期活动管理的比较:一项随机研究的结果
Br J Pain. 2016 Nov;10(4):198-208. doi: 10.1177/2049463716668905. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
Use of Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (ITS) (IONSYS) in the Management of Patients with Acute Postoperative Pain: A Case Series.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)(IONSYS)在急性术后疼痛患者管理中的应用:病例系列
Pain Ther. 2016 Dec;5(2):237-248. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0061-2. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
9
The Efficacy and Safety of the Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (IONSYS) in the Geriatric Population: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Phase III and IIIb Trials.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(IONSYS)在老年人群中的疗效和安全性:III期和IIIb期试验的荟萃分析结果
Drugs Aging. 2016 Dec;33(12):901-912. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0409-7.
10
Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (IONSYS(®)) can be Safely used in the Hospital Environment with X-Rays, Computerized Tomography and Radiofrequency Identification Devices.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(IONSYS(®))可安全用于存在X射线、计算机断层扫描和射频识别设备的医院环境中。
Adv Ther. 2016 Sep;33(9):1649-59. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0381-y. Epub 2016 Jul 16.