Suppr超能文献

芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)与静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)联合吗啡用于腹部或盆腔手术后疼痛管理的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery.

作者信息

Minkowitz Harold S, Rathmell James P, Vallow Sue, Gargiulo Kathryn, Damaraju C V, Hewitt David J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Memorial Hermann Memorial City Hospital, Houston, Texas 77024, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(8):657-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00257.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) has effectively managed pain following several types of surgery. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and ease of care associated with fentanyl ITS and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery.

DESIGN

This open-label, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase IIIb study enrolled 506 postoperative patients at 39 U.S. sites. Patients received fentanyl ITS (40 microg fentanyl/dose) or morphine IV PCA (1 mg morphine/dose). The primary efficacy measure was demonstrating equivalence on the patient global assessment (PGA) of the method of pain control in the first 24 hours of treatment between the groups.

RESULTS

Percentages of patients in the fentanyl ITS and morphine IV PCA groups reporting PGA ratings of "good" or "excellent" in the first 24 hours were statistically equivalent (84.9% vs 84.3%, respectively; difference = 0.7%, 95% CI: -5.6% to 7.0%). Equivalence was also demonstrated based on mean last pain intensity scores in the first 24 hours (3.0 vs 2.9, respectively; difference = 0.1, 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.43). Overall discontinuation rates were not significantly different between groups (16.7% vs 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.128). Patients and nurses reported better ease-of-care ratings for fentanyl ITS than for morphine IV PCA. Commonly occurring adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fentanyl ITS and morphine IV PCA were comparable methods of pain control following abdominal or pelvic surgery; however, fentanyl ITS was rated better than morphine IV PCA for ease of care by patients and nurses.

摘要

目的

盐酸芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)已有效管理多种类型手术后的疼痛。本研究评估了芬太尼ITS与吗啡静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)用于腹部或盆腔手术后疼痛管理的疗效、安全性及护理便利性。

设计

这项开放标签、多中心、随机、活性对照、平行组、IIIb期研究在美国39个地点招募了506名术后患者。患者接受芬太尼ITS(40微克芬太尼/剂量)或吗啡IV PCA(1毫克吗啡/剂量)。主要疗效指标是证明两组在治疗的前24小时内患者对疼痛控制方法的总体评估(PGA)相当。

结果

芬太尼ITS组和吗啡IV PCA组在治疗的前24小时报告PGA评分为“良好”或“优秀”的患者百分比在统计学上相当(分别为84.9%和84.3%;差异=0.7%,95%CI:-5.6%至7.0%)。基于前24小时的平均末次疼痛强度评分也证明了相当性(分别为3.0和2.9;差异=0.1,95%CI:-0.28至0.43)。两组的总体停药率无显著差异(分别为16.7%和11.8%;P = 0.128)。患者和护士报告芬太尼ITS的护理便利性评分优于吗啡IV PCA。两组常见不良事件相似。

结论

芬太尼ITS和吗啡IV PCA是腹部或盆腔手术后相当的疼痛控制方法;然而,患者和护士对芬太尼ITS护理便利性的评分优于吗啡IV PCA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验