Viscusi Eugene R, Ding Li, Itri Loretta M
Thomas Jefferson University, 111 South 11th Street, Gibbon Building, Suite 8490, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
The Medicines Company, 8 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, NJ, 07054, USA.
Drugs Aging. 2016 Dec;33(12):901-912. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0409-7.
Acute postoperative pain management in the geriatric patient can be challenging, including their response to medications. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate whether the efficacy and safety profile of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) (IONSYS) was similar in geriatric (≥65 years) and non-geriatric (<65 years) patients.
Efficacy and safety data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and four randomized, open-label, active-comparator trials were utilized for this analysis. Efficacy was assessed via the patient global assessment (PGA) and the investigator global assessment (IGA) scales. The PGA and IGA are categorical 4-point scales (excellent, good, fair, or poor) with treatment success defined as excellent or good. Safety was evaluated via adverse events.
A total of 1763 patients were assigned to the fentanyl ITS treatment group. Of the 1763 patients in the fentanyl ITS group, 499 patients were ≥65 years of age; 65.1% were 65-74 years of age, 31.7% were 75-84 years of age, and 3.2% were ≥85 years of age. In the fentanyl ITS treatment groups, there were no statistically significant differences between the non-geriatric and geriatric patients in terms of patients reporting success on the PGA at 24 h (80.0 vs. 83.0%, respectively; p = 0.3415). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in success rates on the IGA at study discharge (82.8 vs. 87.5%, respectively; p = 0.1195). The safety profile was similar between the age groups.
Overall, efficacy and safety of the fentanyl ITS were similar between the geriatric and non-geriatric patients.
老年患者术后急性疼痛管理具有挑战性,包括他们对药物的反应。本分析的目的是评估芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)(IONSYS)在老年(≥65岁)和非老年(<65岁)患者中的疗效和安全性是否相似。
本分析使用了三项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验以及四项随机、开放标签、活性对照试验的疗效和安全性数据。疗效通过患者整体评估(PGA)和研究者整体评估(IGA)量表进行评估。PGA和IGA是分类的4分制量表(优秀、良好、中等或差),治疗成功定义为优秀或良好。通过不良事件评估安全性。
共有1763例患者被分配至芬太尼ITS治疗组。在芬太尼ITS组的1763例患者中,499例患者年龄≥65岁;65.1%的患者年龄在65 - 74岁之间,31.7%的患者年龄在75 - 84岁之间,3.2%的患者年龄≥85岁。在芬太尼ITS治疗组中,非老年患者和老年患者在24小时时报告PGA成功的患者比例之间无统计学显著差异(分别为80.0%和83.0%;p = 0.3415)。在研究结束时,两组在IGA成功率方面无统计学显著差异(分别为82.8%和87.5%;p = 0.1195)。各年龄组之间的安全性相似。
总体而言,芬太尼ITS在老年患者和非老年患者中的疗效和安全性相似。