• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用芬太尼的离子导入透皮系统与使用吗啡的患者自控静脉镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的比较。

Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management.

作者信息

Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, Hoppenbrouwers M, Richarz U, Bonnet F

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aem102
PMID:17519263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (fentanyl ITS) enables needle-free, patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management. This study compared the efficacy, safety, and ease of care of fentanyl ITS with patient-controlled, i.v. analgesia (PCIA) with morphine for postoperative pain management.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, multicentre trial enrolled patients in Europe after abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. Patients received fentanyl ITS (n = 325; 40.0 microg fentanyl over 10 min) or morphine PCIA [n = 335; bolus doses (standard at each hospital)] for < or =72 h. Supplemental i.v. morphine was available during the first 3 h. The primary efficacy measure was the patient global assessment (PGA) of the pain control method during the first 24 h.

RESULTS

PGA ratings of 'good' or 'excellent' were reported by 86.2 and 87.5% of patients using fentanyl ITS or morphine PCIA, respectively (95% CI, -6.5 to 3.9%). Mean (sd) last pain intensity scores (numerical rating scale, 0-10) were 1.8 (1.77) and 1.9 (1.86) in the fentanyl ITS and morphine PCIA groups, respectively (95% CI, -0.38 to 0.18). More patients reported a system-related problem for fentanyl ITS than morphine PCIA (51.1 vs 17.9%, respectively). However, fewer of these problems interrupted pain control (4.4 vs 41.3%, respectively). Patients, nurses, and physiotherapists reported more favourable overall ease-of-care ratings for fentanyl ITS than morphine PCIA. Study termination rates and opioid-related side-effects were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Fentanyl ITS and morphine PCIA were comparably effective and safe.

摘要

背景

芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(fentanyl ITS)可为术后疼痛管理提供无针、患者自控镇痛。本研究比较了芬太尼ITS与吗啡患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)用于术后疼痛管理的疗效、安全性及护理便捷性。

方法

一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验纳入了欧洲腹部或骨科手术后的患者。患者接受芬太尼ITS(n = 325;10分钟内给予40.0微克芬太尼)或吗啡PCIA [n = 335;推注剂量(各医院标准剂量)],持续≤72小时。最初3小时内可静脉补充吗啡。主要疗效指标为最初24小时内患者对疼痛控制方法的总体评估(PGA)。

结果

使用芬太尼ITS或吗啡PCIA的患者中,分别有86.2%和87.5%报告疼痛控制为“良好”或“优秀”(95%CI,-6.5%至3.9%)。芬太尼ITS组和吗啡PCIA组的平均(标准差)末次疼痛强度评分(数字评分量表,0 - 10)分别为1.8(1.77)和1.9(1.86)(95%CI,-0.38至0.18)。报告芬太尼ITS系统相关问题的患者多于吗啡PCIA(分别为51.1%和17.9%)。然而,这些问题中干扰疼痛控制的较少(分别为4.4%和41.3%)。患者、护士和物理治疗师对芬太尼ITS的总体护理便捷性评分高于吗啡PCIA。两组的研究终止率和阿片类药物相关副作用相似。

结论

芬太尼ITS和吗啡PCIA的疗效和安全性相当。

相似文献

1
Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management.使用芬太尼的离子导入透皮系统与使用吗啡的患者自控静脉镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102.
2
Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups.芬太尼 HCl 离子电渗经皮贴剂与吗啡静脉患者自控镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的疗效和安全性:患者亚组比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):433-40. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283349d82.
3
Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)与静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)联合吗啡用于腹部或盆腔手术后疼痛管理的疗效和安全性。
Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(8):657-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00257.x.
4
The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的安全性和有效性:三项随机、活性对照临床研究的汇总数据分析
Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1428-36, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281913.28623.fd.
5
Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial.患者自控经皮盐酸芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡泵用于术后镇痛的随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1333-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1333.
6
Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system for acute-pain management after orthopedic surgery: a comparative study with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统用于骨科手术后急性疼痛管理:与吗啡静脉自控镇痛的比较研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.08.011.
7
Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management following gynecological surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于妇科手术后疼痛管理的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Pain Manag. 2015 Sep;5(5):339-48. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.29. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Comparison of postoperative pain management using two patient-controlled analgesia methods: nursing perspective.两种患者自控镇痛方法用于术后疼痛管理的比较:护理视角
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jul;65(7):1370-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04991.x. Epub 2009 May 9.
9
Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management following orthopedic surgery: A pooled analysis of randomized, controlled trials.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于骨科手术后疼痛管理的比较:随机对照试验的汇总分析
J Opioid Manag. 2016 Jan-Feb;12(1):37-45. doi: 10.5055/jom.2016.0310.
10
Patients' assessment of the convenience of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) in the management of postoperative pain after major surgery.患者对盐酸芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)与吗啡静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)用于大手术后疼痛管理的便利性评估。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2009 Sep;10(3):124-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.09.001. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统
Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jan;51(1):71-82. doi: 10.1310/hpj5101-71. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
2
Anaesthesia and analgesia for knee joint arthroplasty.膝关节置换术的麻醉与镇痛
BJA Educ. 2018 Jan;18(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Quo Vadis PCA? A Review on Current Concepts, Economic Considerations, Patient-Related Aspects, and Future Development with respect to Patient-Controlled Analgesia.患者自控镇痛何去何从?关于患者自控镇痛的当前概念、经济考量、患者相关方面及未来发展的综述
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020 Feb 13;2020:9201967. doi: 10.1155/2020/9201967. eCollection 2020.
4
Analysis of Multiple Routes of Analgesic Administration in the Immediate Postoperative Period: a 10-Year Experience.术后即刻镇痛途径的多模式分析:10 年经验。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 11;23(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0754-4.
5
[Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].[跨学科立场文件《围手术期疼痛管理》]
Schmerz. 2017 Oct;31(5):463-482. doi: 10.1007/s00482-017-0217-y.
6
High Body Mass Index and Use of Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System in Postoperative Pain Management: Results of a Pooled Analysis of Six Phase 3/3B Trials.高体重指数与芬太尼离子导入透皮系统在术后疼痛管理中的应用:六项3期/3B期试验的汇总分析结果
Pain Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):29-43. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0064-z. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Comparison of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and routine care with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the management of early postoperative mobilisation: results from a randomised study.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与常规护理联合吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于术后早期活动管理的比较:一项随机研究的结果
Br J Pain. 2016 Nov;10(4):198-208. doi: 10.1177/2049463716668905. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
Use of Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (ITS) (IONSYS) in the Management of Patients with Acute Postoperative Pain: A Case Series.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)(IONSYS)在急性术后疼痛患者管理中的应用:病例系列
Pain Ther. 2016 Dec;5(2):237-248. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0061-2. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
9
The Efficacy and Safety of the Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (IONSYS) in the Geriatric Population: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Phase III and IIIb Trials.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(IONSYS)在老年人群中的疗效和安全性:III期和IIIb期试验的荟萃分析结果
Drugs Aging. 2016 Dec;33(12):901-912. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0409-7.
10
Comparison of Pain Scores in Postoperative Patients: Intravenous Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia vs Iontophoretic Transdermal Fentanyl.术后患者疼痛评分比较:静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛与离子电渗透皮芬太尼
Cureus. 2016 Aug 26;8(8):e752. doi: 10.7759/cureus.752.