Clifton Allan, Pilkonis Paul A
Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;48(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has been described as clinically heterogeneous, with numerous subtypes of the disorder posited. The present study investigated this potential heterogeneity by conducting both confirmatory factor analysis and latent class analysis of consensus ratings of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) Revised Third Edition BPD criteria in a mixed clinical and nonclinical sample (n = 411). Confirmatory factor analysis results suggested that a single factor fit the data most parsimoniously. Latent class analysis results supported 2 latent classes: those with a high likelihood of BPD symptoms (n = 171) and those with a low likelihood (n = 240). The borderline latent class was more inclusive than diagnoses made based on DSM-III-R thresholds and improved prediction of symptom severity and interpersonal dysfunction, suggesting the clinical importance of 3 or more BPD criteria. Future research on subtypes of BPD may benefit by focusing on variables that supplement the DSM criteria.
边缘性人格障碍(BPD)在临床上具有异质性,人们提出了该障碍的众多亚型。本研究通过对一个混合临床和非临床样本(n = 411)中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)修订第三版BPD标准的共识评级进行验证性因素分析和潜在类别分析,来探究这种潜在的异质性。验证性因素分析结果表明,单一因素最简约地拟合了数据。潜在类别分析结果支持两个潜在类别:具有BPD症状高可能性的类别(n = 171)和具有低可能性的类别(n = 240)。边缘性潜在类别比基于DSM-III-R阈值做出的诊断更具包容性,并且改善了对症状严重程度和人际功能障碍的预测,这表明3条或更多BPD标准具有临床重要性。未来关于BPD亚型的研究可能会受益于关注补充DSM标准的变量。