LaBrie Joseph W, Pedersen Eric R, Tawalbeh Summer
Loyola Marymount University, Department of Psychology, 1 LMU Drive, Suite 4700, Los Angeles, California 90045, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jan;68(1):86-90. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.86.
The present study examined the effectiveness of the 2-week period currently used in the categorization of heavy episodic drinking among college students. Two-week drinker-type labels included the following: nonbinge drinker, binge drinker, and frequent binge drinker.
Three samples of college student drinkers (104 volunteers, 283 adjudicated students, and 238 freshmen male students) completed the 3-month Timeline Followback assessment of drinking. Drinking behavior during the last 2 weeks of the month before the study was compared with drinking behavior during the first 2 weeks of the same month to compare behavior and resulting labels during both 2- week periods.
Inconsistencies existed in drinker-type labels during the first 2 weeks of the month and the last 2 weeks of the month for all three samples. Between 40% and 50% of participants in the three samples were classified as a different drinker type across the month. Nonbinge drinkers experienced a wide range of alcohol-related problems, and much variation existed among the frequent-binge-drinker label.
The results suggest that the current definition needs to be modified to accurately identify risky-drinking college students. Expanding the assessment window past 2 weeks of behavior, as well as developing different classification schemes, might categorize risky drinkers more accurately.
本研究考察了当前用于对大学生重度饮酒进行分类的两周时间段的有效性。两周饮酒者类型标签包括:非暴饮者、暴饮者和频繁暴饮者。
三组大学生饮酒者样本(104名志愿者、283名被判定的学生和238名大一男学生)完成了为期3个月的饮酒时间线追溯评估。将研究前一个月最后两周的饮酒行为与同一月前两周的饮酒行为进行比较,以比较两个两周时间段内的行为及由此产生的标签。
所有三个样本在一个月的前两周和最后两周的饮酒者类型标签中均存在不一致情况。三个样本中40%至50%的参与者在一个月内被归类为不同的饮酒者类型。非暴饮者经历了广泛的与酒精相关的问题,频繁暴饮者标签之间也存在很大差异。
结果表明,当前的定义需要修改,以准确识别有风险饮酒行为的大学生。将评估窗口扩大到超过两周的行为,以及制定不同的分类方案,可能会更准确地对有风险饮酒者进行分类。