Minnis Alexandra M, Muchini Angella, Shiboski Stephen, Mwale Magda, Morrison Charles, Chipato Tsungai, Padian Nancy S
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Women's Global Health Imperative and Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
Contraception. 2007 Jan;75(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
Research on the measurement of HIV risk demonstrates that interview mode can affect reporting; however, few studies have applied these findings to assessments of hormonal contraceptive use. This paper examines how audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) influenced reports of hormonal contraceptive use and pregnancy among Zimbabwean women.
Using a prospective, randomized, cross-over design, we compared self-reports obtained with ACASI and face-to-face (FTF) interview among 655 women enrolled in a prospective study on hormonal contraceptive use and HIV acquisition. In addition, self-report data were compared to those collected during clinical exams.
Compared to FTF interviews, reports of hormonal contraceptive use were lower in ACASI [odds ratio (OR)=0.6; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.5-0.6], and reports of pregnancy were higher (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.1-1.9). Both modes of self-report differed from records on contraceptive method disbursement.
Although ACASI yielded higher reports of several reproductive health behaviors, discrepancies between self-reports and clinical data on method disbursement highlight persistent measurement challenges.
关于艾滋病毒风险测量的研究表明,访谈方式会影响报告结果;然而,很少有研究将这些发现应用于激素避孕药使用情况的评估。本文探讨了音频计算机辅助自我访谈(ACASI)如何影响津巴布韦女性激素避孕药使用情况及怀孕情况的报告。
采用前瞻性、随机、交叉设计,我们比较了在一项关于激素避孕药使用和艾滋病毒感染的前瞻性研究中登记的655名女性通过ACASI和面对面(FTF)访谈获得的自我报告。此外,还将自我报告数据与临床检查期间收集的数据进行了比较。
与FTF访谈相比,ACASI中激素避孕药使用情况的报告较低[优势比(OR)=0.6;95%置信区间(95%CI)=0.5 - 0.6],而怀孕情况的报告较高(OR=1.5;95%CI=1.1 - 1.9)。两种自我报告方式均与避孕药具发放记录存在差异。
尽管ACASI对几种生殖健康行为的报告较高,但自我报告与避孕药具发放临床数据之间的差异凸显了持续存在的测量挑战。