Ceballos Gerardo, Ehrlich Paul R
Departamento de Ecologia de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo Postal 70-245, 04510 México D.F., México.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19374-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609334103. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
Hotspots, which have played a central role in the selection of sites for reserves, require careful rethinking. We carried out a global examination of distributions of all nonmarine mammals to determine patterns of species richness, endemism, and endangerment, and to evaluate the degree of congruence among hotspots of these three measures of diversity in mammals. We then compare congruence of hotspots in two animal groups (mammals and birds) to assess the generality of these patterns. We defined hotspots as the richest 2.5% of cells in a global equal-area grid comparable to 1 degrees latitude x 1 degrees longitude. Hotspots of species richness, "endemism," and extinction threat were noncongruent. Only 1% of cells and 16% of species were common to the three types of mammalian hotspots. Congruence increased with increases in both the geographic scope of the analysis and the percentage of cells defined as being hotspots. The within-mammal hotspot noncongruence was similar to the pattern recently found for birds. Thus, assigning global conservation priorities based on hotspots is at best a limited strategy.
在保护区选址中发挥核心作用的热点地区,需要我们重新审慎思考。我们对所有非海洋哺乳动物的分布进行了全球范围的考察,以确定物种丰富度、特有性和濒危状况的模式,并评估这三种哺乳动物多样性衡量指标热点地区之间的一致程度。然后,我们比较了两个动物类群(哺乳动物和鸟类)热点地区的一致性,以评估这些模式的普遍性。我们将热点地区定义为全球等面积网格中最丰富的2.5%的单元,该网格相当于1度纬度×1度经度。物种丰富度、“特有性”和灭绝威胁的热点地区并不一致。在这三种类型的哺乳动物热点地区中,只有1%的单元和16%的物种是相同的。随着分析的地理范围以及被定义为热点地区的单元百分比的增加,一致性也随之增加。哺乳动物内部热点地区的不一致性与最近在鸟类中发现的模式相似。因此,基于热点地区来确定全球保护重点充其量只是一种有限的策略。