Murray T H
Center for Biomedical Ethics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-4976, USA.
J Soc Issues. 1993 Summer;49(2):185-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00927.x.
Scholarly thinking about morality has been deeply affected by the confrontation with practical moral problems epitomized by bioethics. Attention to social context is increasingly seen as vital to sound moral reasoning. The dominant model in bioethics assumes that moral reasoning proceeds downward, from fundamental principles to specific cases. This top-down model, deductivism, is flawed both as a description of moral reasoning, and as a prescription for how moral reasoning should be done. In recent years, another model known as casuistry and based on case-centered moral reasoning has emerged to challenge deductivism. Casuistry suggests new lines of empirical and conceptual research into the history of moral disputes and the practice of moral reasoning and debate.
对道德的学术思考深受与以生物伦理学为代表的实际道德问题的交锋影响。对社会背景的关注日益被视为健全道德推理的关键。生物伦理学中的主导模式假定道德推理是从基本原则向下推导至具体案例。这种自上而下的模式,即演绎主义,无论是作为对道德推理的描述,还是作为道德推理应如何进行的规范,都是有缺陷的。近年来,另一种基于以案例为中心的道德推理的模式,即决疑法,已崭露头角以挑战演绎主义。决疑法为对道德争议历史以及道德推理与辩论实践的实证和概念研究提出了新的思路。