Suppr超能文献

四种减少伤害策略的传播障碍:安大略省成瘾治疗提供者的一项调查

Barriers to the dissemination of four harm reduction strategies: a survey of addiction treatment providers in Ontario.

作者信息

Hobden Karen L, Cunningham John A

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2006 Dec 14;3:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-3-35.

Abstract

A sample of service providers at addictions agencies' in Ontario were interviewed by telephone to assess attitudes toward, anticipated internal and external barriers to implementing, and expected benefits of four harm reduction strategies: needle exchange, moderate drinking goals, methadone treatment, and provision of free condoms to clients. Respondents were also asked to define harm reduction, list its most important elements, and describe what they find most troubling and most appealing about harm reduction. Attitudes toward harm reduction in general and the services provided at each agency were also assessed. Results indicated that the service providers surveyed had positive attitudes toward each of the four harm reduction strategies and harm reduction in general, and the majority of respondents were aware of the benefits associated with each strategy. Almost all of the agencies surveyed allowed for moderate drinking outcomes in the treatment of alcohol problems, and most agencies provided free condoms to clients. In terms of barriers, anticipated negative community reaction to needle exchange, methadone treatment, and free condoms was a major concern for the majority of respondents. Lack of staff, of funding, or anticipated staff resistance were also cited as potential barriers to introducing these strategies. In the case of methadone maintenance, the unavailability of a qualified physician was listed as the primary constraint. Implications for future efforts directed at encouraging the adoption of these strategies and suggestions for future research are discussed.

摘要

研究人员通过电话采访了安大略省成瘾机构的服务提供商样本,以评估他们对四项减少伤害策略的态度、实施过程中预期的内部和外部障碍以及预期收益,这四项策略分别是针头交换、适度饮酒目标、美沙酮治疗以及为客户提供免费避孕套。受访者还被要求定义减少伤害、列出其最重要的要素,并描述他们认为减少伤害最麻烦和最有吸引力的地方。研究人员还评估了总体上对减少伤害以及各机构所提供服务的态度。结果表明,接受调查的服务提供商对这四项减少伤害策略以及总体上的减少伤害都持积极态度,并且大多数受访者都意识到了每项策略所带来的益处。几乎所有接受调查的机构在治疗酒精问题时都允许适度饮酒的结果,并且大多数机构都为客户提供免费避孕套。在障碍方面,大多数受访者主要担心社区对针头交换、美沙酮治疗和免费避孕套会产生负面反应。缺乏工作人员、资金或预期工作人员的抵制也被认为是引入这些策略的潜在障碍。就美沙酮维持治疗而言,合格医生的缺乏被列为主要限制因素。本文讨论了对未来鼓励采用这些策略的努力的影响以及对未来研究的建议。

相似文献

10
What is low threshold methadone maintenance treatment?什么是低门槛美沙酮维持治疗?
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Groundwork for a research programme on harm reduction in alcohol and drug treatment.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995;14(3):331-6. doi: 10.1080/09595239500185431.
3
Harm reduction in Australia: has it worked? A review.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995;14(3):291-304. doi: 10.1080/09595239500185381.
4
Defining harm reduction.界定减少伤害
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995;14(3):287-90. doi: 10.1080/09595239500185371.
9
Measuring treatment process beliefs among staff of specialized addiction treatment services.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998 Jul-Aug;15(4):301-12. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(97)00196-7.
10
Harm reduction: come as you are.减少伤害:保持本色前来。
Addict Behav. 1996 Nov-Dec;21(6):779-88. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(96)00042-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验