Bondas Terese, Hall Elisabeth O C
University College, Borås, Sweden.
Qual Health Res. 2007 Jan;17(1):113-21. doi: 10.1177/1049732306295879.
The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.
本研究的总体目标是通过分析元综合所涉及的挑战,为元综合的发展做出贡献。该研究源于当前元方法开发者对定性元研究的批判。文献中出现了关于方法应用的不同观点,这导致了元综合研究中关于“是什么”“为什么”“如何做”以及“谁来做”等具有挑战性问题的混乱和模糊,这可能会增加误解的风险。元综合研究的根源被视为多方面的,并在不同方向上影响着方法的发展。元综合的主要价值在于理论和/或方法的发展(综合)以及反思的潜力:超越和深入研究(元)。元综合研究还有可能引发关于研究合作、文化和语言的问题。