Suppr超能文献

采用计算机化流体过滤技术评估不同充填技术根管的微渗漏情况。

Evaluation of microleakage of roots filled with different techniques with a computerized fluid filtration technique.

作者信息

Sagsen Burak, Er Ozgür, Kahraman Yasemin, Orucoglu Hasan

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

J Endod. 2006 Dec;32(12):1168-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.016. Epub 2006 Oct 19.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the apical leakage of roots filled with different materials using a computerized fluid filtration technique. There were 36 freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors selected. After preparation and irrigation, 3 experimental groups of 10 roots were constituted. Ten roots were filled with AH Plus and gutta-percha, 10 roots were filled with Sealapex and gutta-percha, and 10 roots were filled with Epiphany sealer and Resilon cone using a single cone technique. Three roots were used as a positive control and three roots were used as a negative control group. Evaluation of the apical leakages was performed with a computerized fluid filtration technique. According to the results, the difference between group 3 and 1 and group 3 and 2 was statistically significant (p<0.05). Although group 2 leaked the most, there was no significant difference between group 1 and 2.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用计算机化流体过滤技术比较不同材料充填根管后的根尖微渗漏情况。选取了36颗新鲜拔除的人上颌中切牙。经过预备和冲洗后,组成了3个实验组,每组10个根管。10个根管用AH Plus和牙胶充填,10个根管用Sealapex和牙胶充填,10个根管采用单尖法用Epiphany封闭剂和Resilon尖充填。3个根管作为阳性对照组,3个根管作为阴性对照组。采用计算机化流体过滤技术评估根尖微渗漏情况。结果显示,第3组与第1组以及第3组与第2组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。虽然第2组渗漏最多,但第1组和第2组之间无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验