Malbrán A, Yeyati E, Rey G L, Galassi N
Unidad de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Clinica, Repulblica Argentina.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2007 Jan;147(1):99-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03265.x.
Diclofenac (Dc) induces an IgE-independent basophil (Ba) degranulation in susceptible individuals. CD63 Ba expression is utilized as an in vitro test for diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. We tested the ability of Dc to induce CD63 Ba expression by flow cytometry (BAT) and Ba degranulation using light microscopy (HBDT) in patients sensitive to Dc. We studied 14 patients with diclofenac hypersensitivity, also two patients sensitive to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp), and 12 normal controls. HBDT was performed by mononuclear cells toluidine blue staining. BAT determined CD63 expression in antiCD63/anti-IgE/anti-CD45-labelled whole blood. In each case, the percentage of activated Ba post-stimulation with 1 and 10 microg/ml Dc was determined. Positive controls included N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) peptide-induced activation. IgE-mediated Ba activation was induced with a Dp allergenic extract. With Dc 1 microg/ml, mean HBDT in Dc-susceptible individuals was 33.62 +/- 18.35% and 8.49 +/- 4.79% in controls (P = 0.0001). Mean BAT was 2.04 +/- 1.68% and 1.93 +/- 1.40% in controls (P = 0.8). Ba preincubation with Dc did not affect fMLP-induced CD63 expression, neither in Dc-sensitive individuals (P = 0.8) (n = 4) nor in subjects without Dc hypersensitivity (P = 0.25) (n = 4). Ba from the two patients sensitive both to Dc and Dp responded to Dp but not to Dc by BAT: Dc, 1.99 +/- 0.78%; Dp: 60.87 +/- 9.28%; but showed degranulation by HBDT: Dc, 30.53 +/- 1.02%, Dp: 48.78 +/- 22.17%. Dc induces Ba degranulation in sensitive patients in a way that does not induce CD63 expression and is different from IgE-mediated and fMLP-mediated degranulation. Our results suggest that CD63 expression is not a reliable diagnostic method for diclofenac allergy.
双氯芬酸(Dc)可在易感个体中诱导不依赖IgE的嗜碱性粒细胞(Ba)脱颗粒。CD63在Ba上的表达被用作药物超敏反应诊断的体外试验。我们通过流式细胞术(BAT)检测了Dc诱导CD63在Ba上表达的能力,并使用光学显微镜(HBDT)检测了Dc敏感患者中Ba的脱颗粒情况。我们研究了14例双氯芬酸超敏患者、2例对粉尘螨(Dp)敏感的患者以及12名正常对照者。HBDT通过单核细胞甲苯胺蓝染色进行。BAT通过抗CD63/抗IgE/抗CD45标记的全血来测定CD63的表达。在每种情况下,均测定了用1和10微克/毫升Dc刺激后活化Ba的百分比。阳性对照包括N-甲酰甲硫氨酰-亮氨酰-苯丙氨酸(fMLP)肽诱导的活化。用Dp变应原提取物诱导IgE介导的Ba活化。对于1微克/毫升的Dc,Dc敏感个体的平均HBDT为33.62±18.35%,而对照组为8.49±4.79%(P = 0.0001)。对照组的平均BAT为2.04±1.68%和1.93±1.40%(P = 0.8)。在Dc敏感个体(P = 0.8)(n = 4)和无Dc超敏反应的受试者(P = 0.25)(n = 4)中,Ba与Dc预孵育均不影响fMLP诱导的CD63表达。两名对Dc和Dp均敏感的患者的Ba通过BAT对Dp有反应,但对Dc无反应:Dc为1.99±0.78%;Dp为60.87±9.28%;但通过HBDT显示有脱颗粒:Dc为30.53±1.02%,Dp为48.78±22.17%。Dc以一种不诱导CD63表达且不同于IgE介导和fMLP介导的脱颗粒的方式在敏感患者中诱导Ba脱颗粒。我们的结果表明,CD63表达不是双氯芬酸过敏可靠的诊断方法。