Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth B E, Adair L S, Du S, Lee N, Popkin B M
Walking Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University East, Mesa, AZ 85212-0180, USA.
Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Jan;33(1):59-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00612.x.
To compare and contrast youth physical activity (PA) and inactivity patterns in two developing Asian countries: the Philippines and China.
Comparative analysis of 1997-1999 Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey and the 1997 China Health and Nutrition Survey, large-scale surveys that included questions on type, frequency and duration of: commuting mode to school, sports/exercise in and outside of school, select sedentary activities and chores.
Filipino data included 760 males and 872 females aged 14-16 years. The comparable Chinese sample consisted of 202 males and 197 females. Active commuting is proportionately high in both countries (70-71% in the Philippines vs. 77-90% in China), although commuting by bicycling is rare in the Philippines (<1%) vs. China ( approximately 35%). Patterns of school sport/exercise participation differ between countries by gender; more Filipino males report school sport/exercise than females (63 vs. 49%) vs. China, where more females participate than males (75 vs. 69%). Sport/exercise outside of school is proportionately low (6-12%) for youth from both countries with a single exception: 74% of Filipino males participate in extra-curricular sport/exercise. Although a higher percentage of Filipino youth report watching television >4 h/day (<10%) vs. Chinese youth (<1%), both are lower than comparable US reports.
In the Philippines, continued modernization augurs a decrease in local primary PA sources (chores and active commuting). In China, where youth already are not expected to perform chores, shifts to more passive commuting modes (i.e. increased motorized transportation) are anticipated.
比较和对比两个亚洲发展中国家——菲律宾和中国——青少年的身体活动（PA）和不活动模式。
对1997 - 1999年宿务纵向健康与营养调查以及1997年中国健康与营养调查进行比较分析，这两项大规模调查包含了关于以下方面的类型、频率和持续时间的问题：上学通勤方式、校内和校外体育活动/锻炼、选定的久坐活动及家务劳动。
菲律宾的数据包括760名14 - 16岁男性和872名女性。与之可比的中国样本由202名男性和197名女性组成。两国积极通勤的比例都较高（菲律宾为70 - 71%，中国为77 - 90%），不过菲律宾骑自行车通勤的情况很少（<1%），而中国约为35%。两国学校体育活动/锻炼的参与模式因性别而异；报告参与学校体育活动/锻炼的菲律宾男性多于女性（63%对49%），而在中国，参与的女性多于男性（75%对69%）。两国青少年校外体育活动/锻炼的比例都较低（6 - 12%），唯一的例外是：74%的菲律宾男性参与课外体育活动/锻炼。虽然报告每天看电视超过4小时的菲律宾青少年比例（<10%）高于中国青少年（<），但两者都低于美国的可比报告。
在菲律宾，持续的现代化预示着当地主要身体活动来源（家务劳动和积极通勤）将减少。在中国，由于青少年本就无需做家务，预计会转向更被动的通勤模式（即增加机动化交通方式）。
