Ilfeld Brian M, Mariano Edward R, Williams Brian A, Woodard Jennifer N, Macario Alex
Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.10.010.
After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), hospitalization may be shortened by allowing patients to return home with a continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB). This study quantified the hospitalization costs for 10 TKA patients receiving ambulatory CFNB versus a matched cohort of 10 patients who received CFNB only during hospitalization.
We examined the medical records (n = 125) of patients who underwent a unilateral, primary, tricompartment TKA with a postoperative CFNB by 1 surgeon at one institution in an 18-month period beginning January 2004. Each of the 10 patients discharged home with an ambulatory CFNB (cases) was matched with a patient with a hospital-only CFNB (controls) for age, gender, body mass index, and health status. Financial data were extracted from the hospital microcosting database.
Nine patients with ambulatory CFNB (cases) were discharged home on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 1 on POD 4. Of the controls, 3 were discharged home on POD 3, 6 on POD 4, and 1 on POD 5. The median (range) costs of hospitalization (excluding implant and professional fees) was US dollars 5,292 (US dollars 4,326-US dollars 7,929) for ambulatory cases compared with US dollars 7,974 (US dollars 6,931-US dollars 9,979) for inpatient controls (difference = US dollars 2,682, 34% decrease, P < .001). The total charges for hospitalization, the implant, and professional fees was US dollars 33,646 (US dollars 31,816-US dollars 38,468) for cases compared with US dollars 39,100 (US dollars 36,096-US dollars 44,098) for controls (difference = US dollars 5,454, 14% decrease, P < .001).
This study provides evidence that ambulatory CFNB for selected patients undergoing TKA has the potential to reduce hospital length of stay and associated costs and charges. However, the current study has significant inherent limitations based on the study design. Additional research is required to replicate these results in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial and to determine whether any savings exceed additional CFNB costs such as from complications, having caregivers provide care at home, and additional hospital/health care provider visits.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)后,允许患者携带持续股神经阻滞(CFNB)回家可缩短住院时间。本研究对10例接受门诊CFNB的TKA患者与10例仅在住院期间接受CFNB的匹配队列患者的住院费用进行了量化。
我们检查了2004年1月开始的18个月期间,在一家机构由1名外科医生进行单侧、初次、三间室TKA并术后接受CFNB的患者的病历(n = 125)。10例携带门诊CFNB出院回家的患者(病例组)中的每一例,均与1例仅在住院期间接受CFNB的患者(对照组)在年龄、性别、体重指数和健康状况方面进行匹配。财务数据从医院微观成本数据库中提取。
9例门诊CFNB患者(病例组)于术后第1天出院回家,1例于术后第4天出院。对照组中,3例于术后第3天出院回家,6例于术后第4天出院,1例于术后第5天出院。门诊病例组住院(不包括植入物和专业费用)的中位数(范围)成本为5292美元(4326美元 - 7929美元),而住院对照组为7974美元(6931美元 - 9979美元)(差值 = 2682美元,降低34%,P < .001)。病例组住院、植入物和专业费用的总费用为33646美元(31816美元 - 38468美元),对照组为39100美元(36096美元 - 44098美元)(差值 = 5454美元,降低14%,P < .001)。
本研究提供的证据表明,对于接受TKA的特定患者,门诊CFNB有可能缩短住院时间并降低相关成本和费用。然而,基于研究设计,当前研究存在显著的固有局限性。需要进一步的研究以前瞻性、随机、对照试验来重复这些结果,并确定任何节省的费用是否超过额外的CFNB成本,如并发症、让护理人员在家护理以及额外的医院/医疗保健提供者就诊所产生的成本。