Girelli C M, Porta P, Malacrida V, Barzaghi F, Rocca F
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Service. 1st Division of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Feb;39(2):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.10.018. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
Capsule endoscopy has a greater diagnostic yield than radiology for detecting subtle inflammatory changes of the small bowel mucosa, but the clinical significance of these abnormalities is still uncertain because of the lack of long-term follow-ups.
To verify the accuracy of capsule endoscopy in a cohort of patients with suspected Crohn's disease of the small bowel, taking as 'gold standard' the final diagnosis made after a long follow-up. From April 2002 to March 2005, we enrolled and examined by capsule endoscopy 27 consecutive patients with abdominal pain and diarrhea lasting more than 3 months and at least one of the following: anaemia, weight loss, fever, extra-intestinal manifestation(s) of inflammatory bowel disease. All patients already had an unremarkable pan-endoscopy, serology for celiac disease and intestinal radiology inconclusive for small bowel abnormality. On the basis of capsule endoscopy findings, patients were distributed in three groups; Group A had severe stricturing lesions requiring surgery; Group B, moderate inflammatory lesions further investigated invasively; Group C, minimal inflammatory changes or normal findings, clinically observed every 3 months (median 21 months, range 15-29).
Small bowel inflammatory lesions were found in 16 of the 27 patients (diagnostic yield 59%). Three had surgery (Group A) and Crohn's disease was confirmed in two; the remainder had ileal adenocarcinoma in a pathological context of chronic inflammation. Crohn's disease was histologically confirmed in four of the five patients in Group B. Group C comprised 19 patients; Crohn's disease was confirmed in seven out of eight with positive capsule endoscopy, while only one of the patients with normal findings later developed overt ileal Crohn's disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio were, respectively, 93%, 84%, 5.8 and 0.08. Assuming a 50% pre-test probability of disease, capsule endoscopy gave a post-test probability of 85%.
In our selected cohort, capsule endoscopy was highly sensitive in detecting small bowel inflammatory changes, enhancing by nearly 35% the pre-test probability of structural small bowel disease. Focal erythema and luminal debris may limit the specificity of capsule endoscopy.
在检测小肠黏膜细微炎症变化方面,胶囊内镜的诊断率高于放射学检查,但由于缺乏长期随访,这些异常的临床意义仍不明确。
以长期随访后的最终诊断为“金标准”,验证胶囊内镜在一组疑似小肠克罗恩病患者中的准确性。2002年4月至2005年3月,我们连续纳入27例腹痛和腹泻持续超过3个月且至少具备以下一项症状的患者,进行胶囊内镜检查:贫血、体重减轻、发热、炎症性肠病的肠外表现。所有患者均已接受全内镜检查且结果无异常,进行了乳糜泻血清学检查,小肠影像学检查对小肠异常的诊断不明确。根据胶囊内镜检查结果,将患者分为三组;A组有严重狭窄病变需要手术治疗;B组有中度炎症病变,需进一步进行侵入性检查;C组有轻微炎症变化或检查结果正常,每3个月进行临床观察(中位时间21个月,范围15 - 29个月)。
27例患者中有16例发现小肠炎症性病变(诊断率59%)。3例接受了手术(A组),其中2例确诊为克罗恩病;其余患者在慢性炎症背景下病理诊断为回肠腺癌。B组5例患者中有4例经组织学确诊为克罗恩病。C组包括19例患者;胶囊内镜检查阳性的8例患者中有7例确诊为克罗恩病,而检查结果正常的患者中只有1例后来发展为明显的回肠克罗恩病。敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为93%、84%、5.8和0.08。假设疾病的预检概率为50%,胶囊内镜检查后的概率为85%。
在我们选定的队列中,胶囊内镜在检测小肠炎症变化方面高度敏感,将小肠结构性疾病的预检概率提高了近35%。局灶性红斑和腔内碎片可能会限制胶囊内镜的特异性。