Nielsen Anders Bo, Jensen Michael Dam, Brodersen Jacob Broder, Kjeldsen Jens, Laursen Christian B, Konge Lars, Laursen Stig Borbjerg
Research Unit of Medical Education, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Endosc Int Open. 2024 May 29;12(5):E697-E703. doi: 10.1055/a-2308-1613. eCollection 2024 May.
The number of procedures needed to acquire a sufficient level of skills to perform an unassisted evaluation of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is unknown. We aimed to establish learning curves, diagnostic accuracy, and the number of procedures needed for reviewing small bowel capsule endoscopies unassisted. An expert panel developed a 1-day course including lessons (examination, anatomy, and pathology) and hands-on training. After completing the course, participants received 50 cases in a randomized sequence. An interactive questionnaire about landmarks, findings, and diagnosis followed each case. After submitting the questionnaire, participants received feedback. Data are presented using CUSUM (cumulative sum control chart) learning curves and sensitivity/specificity analyses compared with expert opinions. We included 22 gastroenterologists from 11 different Danish hospitals. A total of 535 cases were reviewed (mean: 28; range: 11-50). CUSUM plots demonstrated learning progression for diagnosis and findings during the course, but none of the participants reached a learning plateau with sufficient competencies. The sensitivity for all findings was 65% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.82) for the first 20 procedures and 67% (95% CI 0.58-0.73) from case 21 until completion or dropout. The specificity was 63% (95% CI 0.52-0.74) for the first 20 procedures and 57% (95% CI 0.37-0.77) for the rest. Our data indicate that learning SBCE may be more difficult than previously recognized due to low discriminative abilities after 20 cases except for the identification of CD. This indicates that 20 SBCE cases may not be sufficient to achieve competency for reviewing SBCE without supervision.
获得足够技能以独立进行小肠胶囊内镜检查(SBCE)所需的操作数量尚不清楚。我们旨在确定学习曲线、诊断准确性以及独立审查小肠胶囊内镜检查所需的操作数量。一个专家小组开发了一个为期1天的课程,包括课程内容(检查、解剖学和病理学)及实践培训。课程结束后,参与者按随机顺序接收50个病例。每个病例后都有一份关于标志性特征、检查结果和诊断的交互式问卷。提交问卷后,参与者会收到反馈。数据采用累积和控制图(CUSUM)学习曲线呈现,并与专家意见进行敏感性/特异性分析。我们纳入了来自丹麦11家不同医院的22名胃肠病学家。共审查了535个病例(平均:28个;范围:11 - 50个)。CUSUM图显示了课程期间诊断和检查结果的学习进展,但没有参与者达到具有足够能力的学习平台期。前20个操作中所有检查结果的敏感性为65%(95%置信区间[CI] 0.51 - 0.82),从第21个病例到完成或退出时为67%(95% CI 0.58 - 0.73)。前20个操作的特异性为63%(95% CI 0.52 - 0.74),其余操作的特异性为57%(95% CI 0.37 - 0.77)。我们的数据表明,由于除了识别克罗恩病(CD)外,20个病例后鉴别能力较低,学习SBCE可能比之前认为的更困难。这表明20例SBCE病例可能不足以在无监督的情况下达到审查SBCE的能力。