• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲灾害医学培训目标调查。

European survey on training objectives in disaster medicine.

作者信息

Delooz Herman, Debacker Michel, Moens Guido, Johannik Kristien

机构信息

Research Group on Disaster Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;14(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/01.mej.0000224432.43999.87.

DOI:10.1097/01.mej.0000224432.43999.87
PMID:17198322
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As part of the I SEE (Interactive Simulation Exercise for Emergencies) project, financially supported by the Leonardo da Vinci Programme 2000-2006 of the European Commission, a study was planned to assess the type of disaster and to establish the tasks to be included in an emergency exercise to be developed, according to the possible target groups, physicians, nurses, ambulance personnel, dispatchers and first responders. A secondary objective was a description of the actual computer-based training situation in the training centres. A study involving different actors or target groups has not yet been conducted.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed, validated and subsequently distributed to the training centres for the different target groups in the partner countries. Each partner had to contact and interview the person responsible for the training in disaster medicine in the training institution. Data entry and analysis was carried out using the SPSS software on Apple Macintosh. Apart from descriptive statistics of the variables, differences between groups were analysed using analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

In 75 questionnaires out of a total of 206, the combination of a major road traffic accident and a chemical accident was indicated as the first choice (36.4%). These priorities were present for the different countries and all target groups. Concerning the medical procedures to be included in the training exercise, the highest priority was given to medical coordination, medical management on site, medical alert procedures, assessment of immediate needs, medical resources management, victim transport and protection and safety procedures. Only minor differences were noted between countries, different target groups and the institutions irrespective of whether they are involved in response in case of a major accident or disaster. With regard to the secondary objective, 27% of the institutions used computer-based training in disaster medicine and, of those not using computer-based training, 23% plan its use in the near future.

CONCLUSIONS

The European centres surveyed, put the emphasis for disaster medicine training on a mass casualty scenario. In accordance with this choice, prehospital aspects of medical care and management were considered as priorities for training. The I SEE project will develop a template and pilot exercise, serving all countries and providing team training. Among the institutions involved in the survey, a limited number will be invited to participate in the formative evaluation of the pilot exercise.

摘要

目标

作为由欧盟委员会2000 - 2006年达芬奇计划资助的“我见证(紧急情况交互式模拟演练)”项目的一部分,计划开展一项研究,以评估灾害类型,并根据可能的目标群体(医生、护士、救护人员、调度员和第一响应者)确定拟开展的应急演练中应包含的任务。第二个目标是描述培训中心基于计算机的实际培训情况。尚未开展涉及不同行为者或目标群体的研究。

方法

设计了一份问卷,进行了验证,随后分发给伙伴国家中针对不同目标群体的培训中心。每个伙伴都必须联系并采访培训机构中负责灾害医学培训的人员。使用苹果麦金塔电脑上的SPSS软件进行数据录入和分析。除了对变量进行描述性统计外,还使用方差分析和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验分析组间差异。

结果

在总共206份问卷中,75份问卷将重大道路交通事故和化学事故的组合列为首选(36.4%)。这些优先事项在不同国家和所有目标群体中都存在。关于培训演练中应包含的医疗程序,医疗协调、现场医疗管理、医疗警报程序、即时需求评估、医疗资源管理、受害者运输与保护以及安全程序被列为最高优先事项。国家、不同目标群体和机构之间仅存在细微差异,无论它们是否参与重大事故或灾难的应对。关于第二个目标,27%的机构使用基于计算机的灾害医学培训,在未使用基于计算机培训的机构中,23%计划在不久的将来使用。

结论

接受调查的欧洲中心将灾害医学培训的重点放在大规模伤亡场景上。根据这一选择,医疗护理和管理的院前方面被视为培训的优先事项。“我见证”项目将开发一个模板和试点演练,供所有国家使用并提供团队培训。在参与调查的机构中,将邀请有限数量的机构参与试点演练的形成性评估。

相似文献

1
European survey on training objectives in disaster medicine.欧洲灾害医学培训目标调查。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;14(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/01.mej.0000224432.43999.87.
2
A multiphase disaster training exercise for emergency medicine residents: opportunity knocks.针对急诊医学住院医师的多阶段灾难培训演练:机会来了。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 May;12(5):404-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.025.
3
European survey on decontamination in mass casualty incidents.欧洲大规模伤亡事件去污情况调查。
Am J Disaster Med. 2009 May-Jun;4(3):147-52.
4
Training medical staff for pediatric disaster victims: a comparison of different teaching methods.培训针对儿科灾难受害者的医务人员:不同教学方法的比较。
Am J Disaster Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;3(4):189-99.
5
Disaster management among pediatric surgeons: preparedness, training and involvement.儿科外科医生的灾害管理:准备、培训与参与
Am J Disaster Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;3(1):5-14.
6
A state survey of emergency department preparedness for the care of children in a mass casualty event.一项关于大规模伤亡事件中急诊科儿童护理准备情况的州级调查。
Am J Disaster Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;4(4):227-32.
7
Radiation disaster response: preparation and simulation experience at an academic medical center.辐射灾难应对:一所学术医疗中心的准备与模拟经验
J Nucl Med Technol. 2004 Mar;32(1):22-7.
8
The German approach to emergency/disaster management.德国的应急/灾害管理方法。
Med Arh. 2000;54(4):201-3.
9
Prehospital preparedness for pediatric mass-casualty events.儿科大规模伤亡事件的院前准备
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):e756-61. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2856.
10
Emergency medical technicians' disaster training by tabletop exercise.通过桌面演练对急救医疗技术人员进行灾难培训。
Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;19(5):433-6. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2001.24467.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended reality training for mass casualty incidents: a systematic review on effectiveness and experience of medical first responders.针对大规模伤亡事件的扩展现实训练:对医疗急救人员有效性和经验的系统评价
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 23;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00685-3.
2
Extended reality as a training method for medical first responders in mass casualty incidents: A protocol for a systematic review.扩展现实作为大规模伤亡事件中医疗急救人员培训方法的系统评价研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0282698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282698. eCollection 2023.
3
A Literature Study of Medical Simulations for Non-Technical Skills Training in Emergency Medicine: Twenty Years of Progress, an Integrated Research Framework, and Future Research Avenues.
医学模拟在急诊非技术技能培训中的文献研究:二十年的进展、综合研究框架和未来研究方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054487.
4
Knowledge retention and usefulness of simulation exercises for disaster medicine - what do specialty trainees know and think?灾难医学模拟演练的知识保留及实用性——专科培训学员了解什么以及有何看法?
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;11(3):356-360. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
The Effectiveness of Functional Exercises for Teaching Method Disaster Medicine to Medical Students.功能锻炼教学法对医学生灾难医学教学的有效性。
Cureus. 2021 May 21;13(5):e15151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15151.
6
Design and implementation of a medical student hazardous materials response team: the Medical Student HazMat Team.医学生危险材料应急小组的设计与实施:医学生危险材料小组
Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 18;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0195-6.
7
Knowledge levels and training needs of disaster medicine among health professionals, medical students, and local residents in Shanghai, China.中国上海的卫生专业人员、医学生和当地居民的灾难医学知识水平和培训需求。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e67041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067041. Print 2013.
8
Clinical review: mass casualty triage--pandemic influenza and critical care.临床综述:大规模伤亡分诊——大流行性流感与重症监护
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):212. doi: 10.1186/cc5732.