Hald M, Veien N K, Laurberg G, Johansen J D
National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jan;156(1):77-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07565.x.
The severity of hand eczema is of interest in epidemiological studies. Ideally, as no validated methods of self-assessment exist, a dermatologist should examine all subjects. However, this is very resource intensive.
To examine if severity grading performed by patients with hand eczema using a self-administered photographic guide was in agreement with the assessment performed by a trained dermatologist. Furthermore, to measure the correlation between the severity of hand eczema expressed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the clinical severity assessment, using the photographic guide.
Fifty-three consecutive outpatients with hand eczema were included, a number based on a prestudy statistical calculation. The patients were asked to grade current severity of their hand eczema by choosing one of four groups of photographs representing differing severities of hand eczema. On the same day all patients were examined by an experienced dermatologist, who graded the severity using the same photographic guide. The photographic guide was a modified version of a validated guide for use by physicians. In addition, the patients rated the severity of their hand eczema on a VAS.
Fifty-one of the respondents completed the full questionnaire. For 37 of the 51 patients (73%) the clinical severity assessments of patient and dermatologist were identical. The measure of agreement, Cohen's kappa coefficient, was 0.61, indicating good inter-rater agreement. The correlation between the dermatologist-rated severity and the corresponding score by the patients on the VAS was only moderate (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient rho = 0.52).
The photographic guide for the self-assessment of hand eczema is an easy instrument to use, and for research purposes can be a reliable tool for patients with hand eczema to grade severity. A VAS can only be considered as a mediocre tool for estimation of the dermatologist-rated clinical severity, but should be validated as an independent instrument to assess severity of hand eczema.
手部湿疹的严重程度是流行病学研究关注的内容。理想情况下,由于不存在经过验证的自我评估方法,应由皮肤科医生对所有受试者进行检查。然而,这需要大量资源。
研究手部湿疹患者使用自我管理的照片指南进行的严重程度分级是否与经过培训的皮肤科医生的评估一致。此外,使用该照片指南测量视觉模拟量表(VAS)所表达的手部湿疹严重程度与临床严重程度评估之间的相关性。
纳入53例连续的手部湿疹门诊患者,该数量基于研究前的统计计算。要求患者通过选择代表不同严重程度手部湿疹的四组照片之一,对其手部湿疹的当前严重程度进行分级。同一天,所有患者由一位经验丰富的皮肤科医生进行检查,该医生使用相同的照片指南对严重程度进行分级。该照片指南是经过验证的医生使用指南的修改版本。此外,患者在VAS上对其手部湿疹的严重程度进行评分。
51名受访者完成了完整问卷。在51例患者中的37例(73%)中,患者和皮肤科医生的临床严重程度评估结果相同。一致性测量指标,科恩kappa系数为0.61,表明评分者间一致性良好。皮肤科医生评定的严重程度与患者在VAS上的相应评分之间的相关性仅为中等(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数rho = 0.52)。
手部湿疹自我评估的照片指南是一种易于使用的工具,对于研究目的而言,它可以成为手部湿疹患者分级严重程度的可靠工具。VAS只能被视为估计皮肤科医生评定的临床严重程度的一般工具,但应作为评估手部湿疹严重程度的独立工具进行验证。