Suppr超能文献

使用轮廓仪、扫描电子显微镜、原子力显微镜和光泽度仪评估牙科复合材料的表面特性。

Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter.

作者信息

Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Athens, Thivon 2, Goudi 11527, Greece.

出版信息

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Jan;18(1):155-63. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8.

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 x 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at 60 degrees was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (microm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM.

摘要

本体外研究的目的是比较各种粗糙度和形貌测量方法,以表征几种类型树脂复合材料的表面质量。比较了几种树脂复合材料的初始表面质量。评估的材料分为三类:i)混合型:TPH Spectrum;ii)增强微填料型:Micronew;iii)微混合型:Synergy Duo、Esthet-X、Point.4和Palfique Estelite。从每种材料制备三组相同的圆盘状试样(10×1.5毫米)(n = 6),并用Soflex圆盘进行抛光。第1组通过二维轮廓仪测量宏观粗糙度(Ra)。第2组通过原子力显微镜(AFM)获得三维图像并测量微观粗糙度(Ra)。第3组测定60度时的表面光学光泽度。每种材料的试样还通过扫描电子显微镜进行研究。宏观Ra值(微米)范围为0.30至0.56。微观Ra值范围为0.03至0.14,其排序与宏观Ra值不同。光泽度百分比值范围为30.6至70.1%。结果表明,微观粗糙度与光泽度值高度相关(r = 0.93),而宏观粗糙度则不然(r = 0.62)。此外,与二维轮廓仪相比,AFM方法在区分表面粗糙度方面表现出更高的能力,并且比扫描电子显微镜检查更能揭示表面纹理的详细定义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验