Prasad Mohan, Blaisie Rajula Prem, Pl Ravishankar, Rao Sunanda, K Gayathri, V Mounika, Kodali Murali Venkata Rama Mohan, V Kalaivani, Soloman Gracelin, Nisha Nelofar
Periodontology, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu, IND.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 6;16(12):e75243. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75243. eCollection 2024 Dec.
To evaluate the enamel abrasion effects of soft, ultra-soft, and nano-bristle toothbrushes using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to guide toothbrush selection for optimal enamel preservation.
This in vitro study involved 45 extracted human teeth (central and lateral incisors), randomly assigned to three groups (n=15 each): Group I (nano-bristle), Group II (ultra-soft bristle), and Group III (soft bristle). Each specimen underwent 10,000 brushing cycles with a standardized 2 N force to simulate one year of brushing. A slurry of commercially available toothpaste mixed with saline was applied, and brushing was performed with a mechanical brushing simulator. AFM analysis measured enamel surface roughness before and after brushing.
Nano-bristle toothbrushes caused a minimal increase in surface roughness (mean change: 4 nm; p = 0.001), significantly less than the increases seen with soft (mean change: 14.08 nm; p = 0.001) and ultra-soft (mean change: 14.86 nm; p = 0.001) bristle toothbrushes. AFM analysis confirmed that both soft and ultra-soft bristles caused greater enamel abrasion compared to nano-bristles, with no significant difference between soft and ultra-soft bristle groups.
Nano-bristle toothbrushes demonstrated the least enamel abrasion in this study, suggesting they may provide a gentle alternative for preserving enamel integrity.
使用原子力显微镜(AFM)评估软毛、超软毛和纳米刷毛牙刷对牙釉质的磨损影响,以指导选择牙刷,实现牙釉质的最佳保护。
这项体外研究使用了45颗拔除的人类牙齿(中切牙和侧切牙),随机分为三组(每组n = 15):第一组(纳米刷毛)、第二组(超软刷毛)和第三组(软刷毛)。每个样本以标准化的2 N力进行10000次刷牙循环,以模拟一年的刷牙情况。使用市售牙膏与盐水混合制成的糊剂,并通过机械刷牙模拟器进行刷牙。AFM分析测量了刷牙前后牙釉质表面粗糙度。
纳米刷毛牙刷导致表面粗糙度的增加最小(平均变化:4 nm;p = 0.001),明显小于软毛(平均变化:14.08 nm;p = 0.001)和超软毛(平均变化:14.86 nm;p = 0.001)刷毛牙刷。AFM分析证实,与纳米刷毛相比,软毛和超软毛刷毛对牙釉质的磨损更大,软毛组和超软毛组之间无显著差异。
在本研究中,纳米刷毛牙刷对牙釉质的磨损最小,表明它们可能为保持牙釉质完整性提供一种温和的选择。