Eichler Klaus, Zoller Marco, Tschudi Peter, Steurer Johann
Horten Centre for patient oriented research, University hospital of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jan 3;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-1.
Although cardiovascular prediction rules are recommended by guidelines to evaluate global cardiovascular risk for primary prevention, they are rarely used in primary care. Little is known about barriers for application. The objective of this study was to evaluate barriers impeding the application of cardiovascular prediction rules in primary prevention.
We performed a postal survey among general physicians in two Swiss Cantons by a purpose designed questionnaire.
356 of 772 dispatched questionnaires were returned (response rate 49.3%). About three quarters (74%) of general physicians rarely or never use cardiovascular prediction rules. Most often stated barriers to apply prediction rules among rarely- or never-users are doubts concerning over-simplification of risk assessment using these instruments (58%) and potential risk of (medical) over-treatment (54%). 57% report that the numerical information resulting from prediction rules is often not helpful for decision-making in practice.
If regular application of cardiovascular prediction rules in primary care is in demand additional interventions are needed to increase acceptance of these tools for patient management among general physicians.
尽管心血管预测规则被指南推荐用于评估一级预防中的整体心血管风险,但它们在初级保健中很少被使用。对于其应用的障碍知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估阻碍心血管预测规则在一级预防中应用的障碍。
我们通过一份专门设计的问卷对瑞士两个州的全科医生进行了邮寄调查。
772份已发送问卷中有356份被退回(回复率49.3%)。约四分之三(74%)的全科医生很少或从不使用心血管预测规则。在很少或从不使用者中,最常提到的应用预测规则的障碍是对使用这些工具进行风险评估过于简化的怀疑(58%)以及(医疗)过度治疗的潜在风险(54%)。57%的人报告说,预测规则得出的数值信息在实际决策中往往没有帮助。
如果需要在初级保健中常规应用心血管预测规则,就需要采取额外的干预措施,以提高全科医生对这些工具用于患者管理的接受度。