Heistermann H P, Tobusch A, Palmes D
Chirurgische Abteilung, St. Marien-Hospital Köln.
Zentralbl Chir. 2006 Dec;131(6):460-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957031.
Iatrogenic injuries of the bile duct and hepatic artery represent a continuous problem after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this observational study we report about our experiences applying the "critical view of safety", defined as unambiguous identification of the cystic duct and artery by creation of an infundibular window, in order to minimise bile duct lesions and conversion rate.
Between July 2002 and November 2004 100 consecutive laparoscopicly started cholecystectomies were prospectively investigated. The central surgical step of dissection aimed at reaching the "critical view of safety" and its photo printing before cutting the cystic duct and artery, otherwise a conversion was carried out without exception. Primary endpoints of the study were the conversion rate, secondary endpoints the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications, operation time and histological results.
53 of the 100 primary laparoscopic operated patients showed the signs of an acute cholecystitis, 44 patients offered partially multiple abdominal operations in their history. In 19 patients we performed a "therapeutic splitting". Only in 3 patients it was not possible to apply the "critical view of safety" resulting in a conversion to open cholecystectomy. The mean operation time was 81 minutes and the postoperative hospital stay ranged to 5.4 (1-18) days. Postoperatively an insufficiency of cystic duct, a navel infection, an abdominal wall haematoma, an urinary tract infection and a pneumonia occurred in one patient each.
Pivotal factors leading to bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are systematic mistakes in the surgical technique, an insufficient surgical training and human failure of the surgeon. The introduction of the "critical view of safety" represents an objective, understandable and compulsory criterion for minimising the risk of iatrogenic injuries of the bile duct and decision on conversion to open cholecystectomy.
胆管和肝动脉的医源性损伤是腹腔镜胆囊切除术后一直存在的问题。在这项观察性研究中,我们报告了应用“安全关键视野”的经验,即通过创建漏斗状窗口明确识别胆囊管和动脉,以尽量减少胆管损伤和中转开腹率。
2002年7月至2004年11月,对连续100例开始行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行前瞻性研究。解剖的中心手术步骤旨在达到“安全关键视野”并在切断胆囊管和动脉前拍照记录,否则无一例外进行中转开腹。研究的主要终点是中转开腹率,次要终点是术中及术后并发症的发生率、手术时间和组织学结果。
100例初次行腹腔镜手术的患者中,53例有急性胆囊炎体征,44例既往有部分多次腹部手术史。19例患者我们进行了“治疗性劈开”。仅3例患者无法应用“安全关键视野”,导致中转开腹胆囊切除术。平均手术时间为81分钟,术后住院时间为5.4(1 - 18)天。术后,1例患者分别出现胆囊管瘘、脐部感染、腹壁血肿、尿路感染和肺炎。
腹腔镜胆囊切除术后导致胆管损伤的关键因素是手术技术的系统性错误、手术训练不足和外科医生的人为失误。引入“安全关键视野”是一个客观、易懂且强制性的标准,可降低胆管医源性损伤风险并决定是否中转开腹胆囊切除术。