Hatemi Peter K, Medland Sarah E, Morley Katherine I, Heath Andrew C, Martin Nicholas G
Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Behav Genet. 2007 May;37(3):435-48. doi: 10.1007/s10519-006-9138-8. Epub 2007 Jan 13.
Previously we and others have shown evidence for genetic influences on political attitudes and sociodemographic indicators (Martin 1987; Posner et al. 1996; Truett et al. 1992; Eaves et al. 1999). However, the nature of the relationship between political attitudes, social indictors and voting behavior has not been investigated. While heritability estimates for social and political attitudes have been reported in previous research, the heritability for vote choice has not. Furthermore, if vote choice is heritable, it is unclear whether the heritable component can be accounted for through the genetic influence on related social and political traits, or if there exists a unique genetic component specific to voting behavior. In mailed surveys of adult Australian twins, we asked respondents to indicate their usual voting preference as well as attitudes on contemporary individual political items. When vote choice was dichotomized as Labor versus Conservative, twin correlations were r (mz) = 0.81 (1,661 pairs), and r (dz) = 0.69 (1,727 pairs) consistent with modest genetic influence (a (2) = 0.24). However, multivariate genetic analysis showed no unique genetic contribution to voting preference; rather, the genetic influence in vote choice could be explained by shared genetic influences in perceived social class, church attendance and certain key political attitude items.
此前我们和其他研究人员已证实基因对政治态度和社会人口统计学指标存在影响(Martin,1987年;Posner等人,1996年;Truett等人,1992年;Eaves等人,1999年)。然而,政治态度、社会指标与投票行为之间关系的本质尚未得到研究。虽然先前的研究报告了社会和政治态度的遗传力估计值,但投票选择的遗传力尚未有相关报告。此外,如果投票选择具有遗传性,尚不清楚遗传成分是否可以通过基因对相关社会和政治特征的影响来解释,或者是否存在特定于投票行为的独特遗传成分。在对成年澳大利亚双胞胎的邮寄调查中,我们要求受访者表明他们通常的投票偏好以及对当代个人政治议题的态度。当投票选择被二分法分为工党与保守党时,同卵双胞胎的相关性为r(mz)= 0.81(1661对),异卵双胞胎的相关性为r(dz)= 0.69(1727对),这与适度的基因影响一致(a(2)= 0.24)。然而,多变量基因分析表明,投票偏好没有独特的基因贡献;相反,投票选择中的基因影响可以通过在感知社会阶层、教堂礼拜出席率和某些关键政治态度议题中共享的基因影响来解释。