Hung Shuo-Hsun, Lin Yu-Tsan, Chu Chia-Yu, Lee Chien-Chang, Liang Tien-Chi, Yang Yao-Hsu, Wang Li-Chieh, Chiang Bor-Luen
Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Jan;98(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60859-9.
The skin of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) exhibits a striking susceptibility to colonization and infection by Staphylococcus aureus. Treatment with topical anti-inflammatory drugs alone can reduce S. aureus colonization.
To compare the clinical severity of AD and the S. aureus colonization rate between AD patients treated with topical glucocorticoids and those treated with tacrolimus and to evaluate the effects of complementary topical antistaphylococcal antibiotic therapy and the development of fusidic acid-resistant S. aureus.
Sixty AD patients were enrolled in a prospective, parallel, randomized study of an 8-week treatment with topical 0.05% fluticasone propionate or 0.03% tacrolimus, with or without complementary fusidic acid. Disease severity scoring of AD based on SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), colonization rate and density of S. aureus on the skin, and antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus isolates were evaluated.
The reduction in SCORAD scores correlated with the reduction of S. aureus numbers. Treatment with topical tacrolimus resulted in a comparable reduction in SCORAD scores to fluticasone but a slower eradication of S. aureus. Complementary fusidic acid had no additional benefit compared with fluticasone or tacrolimus alone. Two patients developed fusidic acid-resistant S. aureus after 8 weeks of fusidic acid treatment.
Tacrolimus is an appropriate alternative treatment for chronic AD. Topical anti-inflammatory therapy alone to improve the allergic skin inflammation of AD can reduce S. aureus colonization of the skin. Topical antibiotics should be reserved for short-term use in obvious secondary bacterial infection.
特应性皮炎(AD)患者的皮肤对金黄色葡萄球菌的定植和感染表现出显著的易感性。单独使用局部抗炎药物治疗可减少金黄色葡萄球菌的定植。
比较局部使用糖皮质激素治疗的AD患者和使用他克莫司治疗的AD患者的AD临床严重程度及金黄色葡萄球菌定植率,并评估辅助性局部抗葡萄球菌抗生素治疗的效果以及耐夫西地酸金黄色葡萄球菌的产生情况。
60例AD患者参加了一项前瞻性、平行、随机研究,接受为期8周的局部使用0.05%丙酸氟替卡松或0.03%他克莫司治疗,同时或不同时使用辅助性夫西地酸。基于特应性皮炎评分(SCORAD)对AD进行疾病严重程度评分,评估皮肤表面金黄色葡萄球菌的定植率和密度以及金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的抗生素敏感性。
SCORAD评分的降低与金黄色葡萄球菌数量的减少相关。局部使用他克莫司治疗导致SCORAD评分降低程度与氟替卡松相当,但清除金黄色葡萄球菌的速度较慢。与单独使用氟替卡松或他克莫司相比,辅助性夫西地酸没有额外益处。两名患者在接受夫西地酸治疗8周后出现了耐夫西地酸金黄色葡萄球菌。
他克莫司是慢性AD的一种合适替代治疗方法。单独进行局部抗炎治疗以改善AD的过敏性皮肤炎症可减少皮肤金黄色葡萄球菌的定植。局部抗生素应保留用于明显的继发性细菌感染的短期治疗。