Licht-Strunk Els, van der Windt Daniëlle A W M, van Marwijk Harm W J, de Haan Marten, Beekman Aartjan T F
Department of General Practice, Institute for Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract. 2007 Apr;24(2):168-80. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml071. Epub 2007 Jan 20.
Little is known about the prognosis of depression in older patients in general practice or the community.
To summarize available evidence on the course and prognostic factors of depression in older persons.
We conducted a systematic, computerized search of Medline and PsycINFO. Manual search of references of included studies were done. Studies potentially eligible for inclusion were discussed by two reviewers. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. Data regarding selection criteria, duration of follow-up, outcome of depression and prognostic factors were extracted.
We identified 40 studies reporting on four cohorts in general practice and 17 in the community. Of all, 67% were of high quality. Follow-up was up to 1 year in general practice and up to 10 years in the community. Information on treatment was hardly provided. About one in three patients developed a chronic course. Five cohorts used more than two measurements during follow-up, illustrating a fluctuating course of depression. Using a best evidence synthesis we summarized the value of prognostic indicators. General practice studies did not provide strong evidence for any factor. Community studies provided strong evidence for an association of baseline depression level, older age, external locus of control, somatic co-morbidity and functional limitations with persistent depression.
Within the older population, age seems to be a negative prognostic factor, while older people are more likely to be exposed to most of the other prognostic factors identified.
在全科医疗或社区中,老年患者抑郁症的预后情况鲜为人知。
总结关于老年人抑郁症病程及预后因素的现有证据。
我们对Medline和PsycINFO进行了系统的计算机检索。对纳入研究的参考文献进行了手工检索。两位评审员讨论了可能符合纳入标准的研究。两位评审员独立评估方法学质量。提取了关于选择标准、随访时间、抑郁症结局和预后因素的数据。
我们确定了40项关于全科医疗中四个队列的研究报告,以及17项社区研究报告。其中,67%质量较高。全科医疗中的随访时间长达1年,社区中的随访时间长达10年。几乎没有提供关于治疗的信息。约三分之一的患者病程呈慢性。五个队列在随访期间使用了两次以上的测量,表明抑郁症病程呈波动状态。我们通过最佳证据综合法总结了预后指标的价值。全科医疗研究没有为任何因素提供有力证据。社区研究为基线抑郁水平、高龄、外部控制点、躯体共病和功能受限与持续性抑郁之间的关联提供了有力证据。
在老年人群中,年龄似乎是一个负面预后因素,而老年人更有可能暴露于已确定的大多数其他预后因素中。