Ector Joris, Ganame Javier, van der Merwe Nico, Adriaenssens Bert, Pison Laurent, Willems Rik, Gewillig Marc, Heidbüchel Hein
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Eur Heart J. 2007 Feb;28(3):345-53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl468. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
Spontaneous or inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in endurance athletes frequently originate from the right ventricle (RV), even in the absence of familial arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy (ARVC). The goal of this study was to determine whether the RV arrhythmogenic predilection in these patients is associated with RV functional abnormalities.
Biplane RV angiography was performed in three groups: 22 endurance athletes with VA, 15 matched athletes without VA, and 10 non-athletes without VA. Four methods for quantitative RV angiographic analysis (area length, Boak, pyramid monoplane, and pyramid biplane) were used to calculate RV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) (both corrected for body surface area) and ejection fraction (EF). In addition RV outflow tract shortening fraction (SF) was determined. Although only 6 of 22 (27%) athletes with VA fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for ARVC, RV arrhythmogenic involvement was manifest or probable in 82%, based on a combination of electrophysiologic, electrocardiographic, and morphologic criteria. RV EDV in athletes was higher than in non-athletes (area length: 100.3 +/- 26.9 vs. 69.6 +/- 14.3 mL/m(2), P = 0.001), without significant difference between athletes with and without VA. RV ESV, in contrast, was significantly higher in athletes with VA than in athletes without VA (52.6 +/- 22.3 vs. 35.5 +/- 11.2 mL/m(2), P = 0.004), resulting in a significantly lower RV EF, a consistent finding across all methods (area length: 49.1 +/- 10.4 vs. 63.7 +/- 6.4%, P < 0.001). This functional impairment was also reflected in a lower RV outflow tract SF (SF right anterior oblique 32.2 +/- 10.1 vs. 40.0 +/- 11.6%, P = 0.09; SF left anterior oblique (LAO) 31.9 +/- 7.8 vs. 39.0 +/- 10.5%, P = 0.10).
VA in high-level endurance athletes frequently originate from a mildly dysfunctional RV. This raises the question whether endurance exercise not only acts as a trigger for these arrhythmias but also as promoter of the RV changes.
耐力运动员的自发性或诱发性持续性室性心律失常(VA)常起源于右心室(RV),即使在没有家族性致心律失常性右心室心肌病(ARVC)的情况下也是如此。本研究的目的是确定这些患者右心室的致心律失常倾向是否与右心室功能异常有关。
对三组人群进行了双平面右心室血管造影:22例患有VA的耐力运动员、15例匹配的无VA的运动员和10例无VA的非运动员。采用四种定量右心室血管造影分析方法(面积长度法、博克法、单平面金字塔法和双平面金字塔法)计算右心室舒张末期容积(EDV)和收缩末期容积(ESV)(均校正体表面积)以及射血分数(EF)。此外,还测定了右心室流出道缩短分数(SF)。虽然22例患有VA的运动员中只有6例(27%)符合ARVC的诊断标准,但根据电生理、心电图和形态学标准综合判断,82%的患者右心室存在明显或可能的致心律失常性病变。运动员的右心室EDV高于非运动员(面积长度法:100.3±26.9 vs. 69.6±14.3 mL/m²,P = 0.001),有VA和无VA的运动员之间无显著差异。相比之下,患有VA的运动员的右心室ESV显著高于无VA的运动员(52.6±22.3 vs. 35.5±11.2 mL/m²,P = 0.004),导致右心室EF显著降低,所有方法均得到一致结果(面积长度法:49.1±10.4 vs. 63.7±6.4%,P < 0.001)。这种功能损害也反映在较低的右心室流出道SF上(右前斜位SF 32.2±10.1 vs. 40.0±11.6%,P = 0.09;左前斜位(LAO)SF 31.9±7.8 vs. 39.0±10.5%,P = 0.10)。
高水平耐力运动员的VA常起源于轻度功能不全的右心室。这就提出了一个问题,即耐力运动是否不仅是这些心律失常的触发因素,也是右心室变化的促进因素。